2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-016-0984-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prediction of aggregate modified index (AMI) using geomechanical properties of limestones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 500 rotations, the weight loss of aggregates thicker than the mesh size from the 1.7 mm sieve was about 1 g. It was shown that it is possible to predict each range of aggregate degradation. In turn, in References [57,58], coarse aggregate was analyzed to determine the compressive strength of concrete. It was shown that the higher the Los Angeles (LAA) value, the lower the compressive strength of the concrete.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 500 rotations, the weight loss of aggregates thicker than the mesh size from the 1.7 mm sieve was about 1 g. It was shown that it is possible to predict each range of aggregate degradation. In turn, in References [57,58], coarse aggregate was analyzed to determine the compressive strength of concrete. It was shown that the higher the Los Angeles (LAA) value, the lower the compressive strength of the concrete.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an aggregate material via extracted quarrying operations it is used in the construction of the roads, foundations, bridges and tunnel lining, and are essential for the development of modern economy (Galetakis et al 2012). In order to evaluate aggregate suitability for any construction application it is utmost necessary to perform a series of engineering tests, including speci c gravity (SG), water absorption test (WA), bulk density (BD), akiness index (FI), elongation index (EI), aggregate impact values (AIV), los angles abrasion value (LAAV), uniaxial compress strength (UCS), point load test (PLT), ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) and Schmidt hammer rebound test (SHRMT) (Khanlari and Naseri 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%