[Retracted] Automatic Segmentation of Calcification Areas in Digital Breast Images

Abstract

In this study, the authors hope to demonstrate that when mammography is combined with intelligent segmentation techniques, it can become more effective in diagnosing breast abnormalities and aiding in the early detection of breast cancer. In conjunction with intelligent segmentation techniques, mammography can be made more effective in diagnosing breast abnormalities and aiding in the early diagnosis of breast cancer, hence increasing its overall effectiveness. The methodology, which includes some concepts of digital imaging and machine learning techniques, will be described in the following section after a review of the literature on breast cancer (categories, prevention involving the environment and lifestyle, diagnosis, and tracking of the disease) has been completed (neural networks and random forests). It was possible to achieve these results by working with an image collection that previously had questionable regions (per the given technique). Fiji software extracted problematic candidate regions from mammography images, which were subsequently subjected to further examination. To categorize the results of the picture segmentation, they were sorted into three groups, which were as follows: random forest and neural networks both generated promising results in the segmentation of suspicious parts that were emphasized in the highlight of the image, and this was true for both algorithms. Detection of contours of the regions was carried out, indicating that cuts of these segmented sections may be created. Later on, automatic categorization of the targets can be carried out using a learning algorithm, as illustrated in the experiment.

Retracted: Automatic Segmentation of Calcification Areas in Digital Breast Images

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”