1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00400-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED: Preoperative microbiologic screening and antibiotic prophylaxis in pulmonary resection operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in contrast to other studies that found antibiotic resistance in 32-50% [18,19] of the patients. This difference could be explained by the fact that most of the patients in the present study had wellpreserved lung function while patients in other studies had a significant degree of airway obstruction, associated with severe exacerbation and frequent antibiotic treatment which may have led to antibiotic resistance [20].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in contrast to other studies that found antibiotic resistance in 32-50% [18,19] of the patients. This difference could be explained by the fact that most of the patients in the present study had wellpreserved lung function while patients in other studies had a significant degree of airway obstruction, associated with severe exacerbation and frequent antibiotic treatment which may have led to antibiotic resistance [20].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…According to the patients' general status and suspected underlying disease, prophylactic antibiotic may be given with appropriate dosages [18,21] . Antibiotics should be considered on basis of the suspected pathologies and applied after culture and antibiotic susceptibility results [15,18,21,29,30] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibiotics should be considered on basis of the suspected pathologies and applied after culture and antibiotic susceptibility results [15,18,21,29,30] . In presented study, because pulmonary infection risk was evaluated, the antibiotic was not applied to dogs due to study plan at 0, 24 and 48 th h. However, considering to antibiotic susceptibility results of a previous study [21] , a selective antibiotic (ampicillin sulbactam) was applied to all dogs both prophylactically and as treatment protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Boldt and colleagues, in 1999, suggested that the best schedule for antibiotic prophylaxis will depend, among other factors, on the bacteria that are present at the time when these patients undergo surgery [32]. They carried out a randomized prospective study in which they compared ampicillin sulbactam (group 1) and cephazoline (group 2).…”
Section: Antibiotic Prophylaxis In Lung-resection Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%