[Retracted] The Value of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in Liver Nodular Lesions

Abstract

In order to analyze the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in the early differential diagnosis of liver nodular lesions, the authors studied the value of MRI in liver nodular lesions. A total of 82 patients with liver nodular lesions admitted to the hospital were selected for retrospective analysis; all of them underwent CEUS and fMRI examinations, and taking a biopsy or postoperative pathological examination results as the gold standard, the diagnostic value of CEUS, fMRI single item, and the two combined examinations for liver nodular lesions was analyzed by four-table. The biopsy or postoperative pathological examination results showed that a total of 88 lesions were detected in 82 patients, including 51 patients with benign lesions, with 54 lesions, and 31 patients with malignant lesions, with 34 lesions. Taking biopsy or pathological examination results as the gold standard, the four-table analysis CEUS had a sensitivity of 79.63%, a specificity of 82.35%, an accuracy of 80.68%, and a Kappa value of 0.603 for diagnosing benign and malignant liver nodular lesions. The sensitivity of fMRI in diagnosing benign and malignant liver nodular lesions was 83.33%, the specificity was 85.29%, the accuracy was 84.09%, and the Kappa value was 0.672; the combined sensitivity of the two in the diagnosis of benign and malignant liver nodular lesions was 94.44%, the specificity was 91.18%, the accuracy was 93.18%, and the Kappa value was 0.856, both of which were superior to single detection, and the difference in accuracy was statistically significant ( χ 2 = 5.683, P < 0.05 ). CEUS and fMRI have a certain value in the differential diagnosis of liver nodular lesions; the combination of the two can improve the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy, and has more clinical application value.

Retracted: The Value of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in Liver Nodular Lesions

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”