2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.02.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retroperitoneoscopic vs open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
27
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The success rate is similar to that of open surgery but the low number of reports might indicate that this technique remains a challenge to perform and teach [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The success rate is similar to that of open surgery but the low number of reports might indicate that this technique remains a challenge to perform and teach [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…[8,10,11] However, the age of patients who undergo minimally invasive pyeloplasty can be even lower. It has been reported that LP is the standard treatment for UPJ obstruction in children from 3 years of age [20], and even from 4 months of age [21] in some institutions. Nevertheless, pediatric laparoscopic surgery has not been widely adopted, possibly due to its technical difficulty and long learning curve, whereas RALP is the most commonly reported robotic surgery in children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid the inconveniences of intraoperative cystoscopy, antegrade placement of a JJ stent during pyeloplasty has been popularized [6,7], and has been shown to reduce operative time [8]. Some have introduced the stent through a 14-gauge cannula [9] or a 5-mm port [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the double J stent has been effective, it requires a second anesthetic for its removal in children. In addition, it is often difficult to pass the double J into the bladder in a percutaneous fashion [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%