2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing Atomistic Mechanisms of Gold-Catalyzed Germanium Growth Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Abstract: The vapor−liquid−solid (VLS) method is considered a plausible technique for synthesizing germanium (Ge) nanostructures (e.g., nanowires), which have a broad range of applications due to their unique electronic properties and intrinsic compatibility with silicon. However, crystallization failures and material defects are still frequently observed in VLS processes, with insufficient understanding of their underlying mechanisms due to instrumental limitations for high-resolution in situ characterizations. Employi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computationally, this is an unusually slow rate for epitaxial growth in nonreactive systems, e.g., the growth of semiconductors, such as Si, Ge, and their alloy SiGe, or metals, 29,39,40 which under ideal undercooling conditions can reach the maximum velocity at which it is possible to "pull" the crystal at growth rates up to 15−20 m/s. In comparison, the experimental growth velocity for GaN is exceptionally slow, 0.03−0.7 μm/min (equivalent to 5 × 10 −10 −1.17 × 10 −8 m/ s).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computationally, this is an unusually slow rate for epitaxial growth in nonreactive systems, e.g., the growth of semiconductors, such as Si, Ge, and their alloy SiGe, or metals, 29,39,40 which under ideal undercooling conditions can reach the maximum velocity at which it is possible to "pull" the crystal at growth rates up to 15−20 m/s. In comparison, the experimental growth velocity for GaN is exceptionally slow, 0.03−0.7 μm/min (equivalent to 5 × 10 −10 −1.17 × 10 −8 m/ s).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%