2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2003.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse dorsal digital and intercommissural flaps used for digital reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Keramidas et al 28 used a sensory dorsal is- land flap, including one DBPDN in 21 digits, which resulted in an average static 2PD of 13 mm in the flaps. Pan et al 29 and Zhao et al 30 used the sensory flap from the homodigital dorsum of the digit, with one neurorrhaphy between the DBPDN and PDN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keramidas et al 28 used a sensory dorsal is- land flap, including one DBPDN in 21 digits, which resulted in an average static 2PD of 13 mm in the flaps. Pan et al 29 and Zhao et al 30 used the sensory flap from the homodigital dorsum of the digit, with one neurorrhaphy between the DBPDN and PDN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawback of the technique is the long scar from near the wrist to the middle phalanx. 14,15 The reverse digital artery flap harvested from the proximal phalanx has the drawback of the loss of 1 of the PDAs. 6,7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pan et al 25 used a dorsal island pedicle flap including a single dorsal digital nerve in 7 digits resulting in 6 to 9 mm of static 2-point discrimination in the flaps. Coverage of a fingertip defect with the dorsal island pedicle flap was also reported by Keramidas et al 26 and Zhao et al 27 In these cases, only 1 dorsal digital nerve was coapted to 1 of the proper digital nerves, which resulted in 13 and 8 mm of static 2-point discrimination in the fingertips, respectively. At the finger pulp, normal fingertip SemmesWeinstein values range from 1.65 to 2.83 g. 28 The mean Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test scores in our cases are greater than that of either the contralateral side or normal range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%