Reversible G Protein βγ9 Distribution-Based Assay Reveals Molecular Underpinnings in Subcellular, Single-Cell, and Multicellular GPCR and G Protein Activity

Abstract

Current assays to measure the activation of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and G proteins are time-consuming, indirect, and expensive. Therefore, an efficient method which directly measures the ability of a ligand to govern GPCR-G protein interactions can help to understand the molecular underpinnings of the associated signaling. A live cell imaging-based approach is presented here to directly measure ligand-induced GPCR and G protein activity in real time. The number of active GPCRs governs G protein heterotrimer (αβγ) dissociation, thereby controlling the concentration of free βγ subunits. The described γ9 assay measures the GPCR activation-induced extent of the reversible βγ9 subunit exchange between the plasma membrane (PM) and internal membranes (IMs). Confocal microscopy-based γ9 assay quantitatively determines the concentration dependency of ligands on GPCR activation. Demonstrating the high-throughput screening (HTS) adaptability, the γ9 assay performed using an imaging plate reader measures the ligand-induced GPCR activation. This suggests that the γ9 assay can be employed to screen libraries of compounds for their ability to activate GPCRs. Together with subcellular optogenetics, the spatiotemporal sensitivity of the γ9 assay permits experimental determination of the limits of spatially restricted activation of GPCRs and G proteins in subcellular regions of single cells. This assay works effectively for GPCRs coupled to αi/o and αs heterotrimers, including light-sensitive GPCRs. In addition, computational modeling of experimental data from the assay is used to decipher intricate molecular details of the GPCR-G protein activation process. Overall, the γ9 assay provides a robust strategy for quantitative as well as qualitative determination of GPCR and G protein function on a single-cell, multicell, and subcellular level. This assay not only provides information about the inner workings of the signaling pathway, but it also strengthens GPCR deorphanization as well as drug discovery efforts.

Gγ identity dictates efficacy of Gβγ signaling and macrophage migration

“…As an extension to our previous model (37), reactions for Gβγ effector activation in a multi-Gγ containing cell were modeled, to decipher how a diverse group of Gγ types in a cell controls Gβγ effector activities. The optimized model (variation 3) encompasses reactions in Fig.…”

Statins Perturb GβγSignaling and Cell Behavior in a GγSubtype Dependent Manner

“…Visual transduction requires the activation of G-protein heterotrimers by light-activated opsins, and cells in the retina primarily use farnesylated Gg types (Gg1 and Gg9) in heterotrimers. Since statins greatly perturb the PM localization of the farnesylated Gg types, we examined whether statins reduce Gbg translocation (which is considered a measure of heterotrimer activation) (Senarath et al, 2016) in adult retinal pigment epithelial-19 (ARPE-19) cells. Gg-subtype expression profile of ARPE-19 cells was determined using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).…”

Two independent but synchronized Gβγ subunit–controlled pathways are essential for trailing-edge retraction during macrophage migration

“…To examine whether opsins and G proteins can be activated exclusively at the LE, the G␥9 assay was used (39). This assay employs the translocation of mCherry G␥9 (mCh-␥9) from the PM to internal membranes (IMs), generated by activated GPCRs.…”