2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.2010.01031.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review article: The catastrophic impact of invasive mammalian predators on birds of the UK Overseas Territories: a review and synthesis

Abstract: The UK has sovereignty over 16 Overseas Territories, which hold some of the world’s great seabird colonies and collectively support more endemic and globally threatened bird species than the whole of mainland Europe. Invasive alien mammalian predators have spread throughout most of the Territories, primarily since European expansion in the 16th century. Here we review and synthesize the scale of their impacts, historical and current, actions to reduce and reverse these impacts, and priorities for conservation.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This search returned 771 records, which we inspected to determine whether invasive alien predators were identified as a known or likely threat to each species (n = 703 species identified as negatively impacted by invasive predators). We crosschecked this list against previous reviews (1,18,20,(44)(45)(46)(47)(48) and added 35 additional threatened species recorded as being negatively affected by invasive predators, but not revealed in our Red List search. Given the small number of additional species identified and the broad geographic coverage of the previous studies used for cross-checking, we do not consider that this exercise brings any systematic bias to our analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This search returned 771 records, which we inspected to determine whether invasive alien predators were identified as a known or likely threat to each species (n = 703 species identified as negatively impacted by invasive predators). We crosschecked this list against previous reviews (1,18,20,(44)(45)(46)(47)(48) and added 35 additional threatened species recorded as being negatively affected by invasive predators, but not revealed in our Red List search. Given the small number of additional species identified and the broad geographic coverage of the previous studies used for cross-checking, we do not consider that this exercise brings any systematic bias to our analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They support a wealth of biodiversity (Prince and Croxall 1996;Procter and Fleming 1999;Cuthbert 2004;Angel and Cooper 2006;Sheppard et al 2013;Churchyard et al 2014;Friedlander et al 2014;Weber et al 2014;Havery et al 2015) much of which faces immediate threat, particularly from invasive alien species (Hilton and Cuthbert 2010;Dawson et al 2015). However, conservation action is constrained by the limited, poorly prioritised, and taxonomically biased biodiversity information (Clark and May 2002;Game et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cats are efficient predators that can kill both adults and chicks of most small or medium-sized species of seabirds. Procellariides' naive and clumsy behavior when on the ground makes them particularly vulnerable to introduced predators (Bourgeois and Vidal, 2008;Hilton and Cuthbert, 2010). Due to their long lifespans, low reproductive rates and delayed maturity, the population dynamics of these seabird species is particularly sensitive to adult mortality (e.g.…”
Section: Overall Cat Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%