2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.acclit.2013.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of choice-based, matched, and other stratified sample studies in auditing research

Abstract: The use of choice-based, matched, and other stratified sample designs is common in auditing research. However, it is not widely appreciated that the data analysis for these studies has to take into account the non-random nature of sample selection in these designs. A choice-based, matched or otherwise stratified sample is a nonrandom sample that must be analyzed using conditional analysis techniques. We review five research streams in the auditing area. These streams include work on determinants of audit litig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that my main results likely do not suffer from the potential problems noted in Cram et al (2009) and Stuart et al (2013).…”
Section: Conditional Logitmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that my main results likely do not suffer from the potential problems noted in Cram et al (2009) and Stuart et al (2013).…”
Section: Conditional Logitmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…While conditional logits are rarely performed in accounting research, Cram, Karan, and Stuart (2009) and Stuart, Shin, Cram, and Karan (2013) argue that conditional logit is the proper method for analyzing matched samples of data. Using simulations, Cram et al (2009) show that failure to use conditional logit when dealing with matched data can lead to incorrect acceptance or rejection of the null hypothesis.…”
Section: Conditional Logitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring the timing, nature, and extent of actions requires hand-collection of remediation disclosures. Choice-based matched samples are frequently used when data collection is costly, especially when outcomes are rare (Cram et al 2009;Stuart et al 2013). The use of a matched sample design allows me to focus power on estimating parameters for the timing, extent, and nature of remediation strategy while controlling for other variables that are not the focus of my study.…”
Section: Empirical Design and Sample Selection Empirical Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is unclear what a credible first stage prediction model would include. Stuart et al (2013) and Cram et al (2009) conclude that methods such as propensity score matching are not necessary when using a choicebased fully matched sample for a binary dependent variable as long as conditional logistic regression is used. 15.…”
Section: Procedures To Match Subsequent Misstatements To Underlying Mwsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los datos carecen de independencia y no cumplen algunos de los requisitos para las regresiones lineales (Chang, Lin, Liu, Shiue, & Wheatley, 2018). Por esta razón, muchos trabajos que desarrollan este enfoque usan métodos sofisticados, como muestras estratificadas (Stuart, Shin, Cram, & Karan, 2013), análisis de metarregresión (Hay & Knechel, 2017) o modelo lineal jerárquico (Chang, Lin, Liu, Shiue, & Wheatley, 2018), en busca de una mayor credibilidad para las investigaciones llevadas a cabo en auditoría. Recientemente se publicó un libro que presenta las bases de datos con información disponible para llevar a cabo investigaciones en este campo (Weirich, Churyk, & Pearson, 2015).…”
Section: Enfoques Y Métodos De Investigación Utilizadosunclassified