2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/aade3f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of memristor devices in neuromorphic computing: materials sciences and device challenges

Abstract: The memristor is considered as the one of the promising candidates for next generation computing systems. Novel computing architectures based on memristors have shown great potential in replacing or complementing conventional computing platforms based on the von Neumann architecture which faces challenges in the big-data era such as the memory wall. However, there are a number of technical challenges in implementing memristor based computing. In this review, we focus on the research performed on the memristor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
271
0
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 418 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
271
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The arrows of Figure 6 represent the current flowing through a chosen memristor in case of write, erase, and read processes. Notably, there are non-idealities such as sneak currents and wire resistance in array-level, which could degrade the performance of neuromorphic computing [35,44,[58][59][60]. The sneak currents affect learning accuracy and epochs because of undesired information, especially large-scale array.…”
Section: Neuromorphic Systems Based On Crossbar Array Of Memristor Symentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The arrows of Figure 6 represent the current flowing through a chosen memristor in case of write, erase, and read processes. Notably, there are non-idealities such as sneak currents and wire resistance in array-level, which could degrade the performance of neuromorphic computing [35,44,[58][59][60]. The sneak currents affect learning accuracy and epochs because of undesired information, especially large-scale array.…”
Section: Neuromorphic Systems Based On Crossbar Array Of Memristor Symentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This influences output currents, leading to degradation of learning performance. The non-idealities in array-level could be overcome by device functions [35,44], operational scheme [39,[58][59][60], or learning algorithms [35,[40][41][42][43][44] to some degree.…”
Section: Neuromorphic Systems Based On Crossbar Array Of Memristor Symentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A synaptic device in a crossbar array based analog hardware NN must have several conductance states that can be controlled electrically to store and update the weight values of the NN. Several Non Volatile Memory (NVM) devices like floating gate transistors, chalcogenide based Phase Change Memory (PCM) devices, oxide based Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM) devices and spintronic devices have been proposed and used as synaptic devices in previous implementations of analog hardware NN [5,6,7,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. However, these NVM devices have several issues associated with them with respect to achieving on-chip learning in crossbar arrays made of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floating gate transistor synapses need high voltage pulses for weight update and have low endurance [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Memristive oxide based Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM) devices and Phase Change Memory (PCM) devices [16,17,18] exhibit an asymmetric/unipolar and non-linear dependence between conductance (and weight) update and programming pulses, which affects the accuracy during on-chip learning of crossbar arrays that use such devices [5,25,26,27]. Moreover, for fabricating RRAM, PCM or spintronic device based hardware NN systems [5,7,28], dedicated in-house fabrication facilities are needed since they involve novel materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation