Review: Types of socioecological production landscapes of the Philippines based on dominant biodiversity: status, problems and future directions

Abstract

Abstract. Buot IE Jr, Buhay AFV. 2022. Review: Types of socioecological production landscapes of the Philippines based on dominant biodiversity: status, problems and future directions. Biodiversitas 23: 3755-3770. The dominance of human activities in socioecological production landscapes (SEPLs) known as biocultural landscapes in some literature, results in the overutilization of natural resources and loss of critically important biodiversity, either cultivated or wild. The anthropocentric perspective prevailing at this time of the Anthropocene Epoch, disrupts the traditional harmonious human-nature relationship in biocultural landscapes, particularly, the socioecological production landscapes (SEPLs) known as satoyama landscapes in Japan. This adversely affects biodiversity and hence, ecosystem services in surrounding communities in the Philippines and beyond. In this paper, SEPLs, biocultural landscape and satoyama are used interchangeably to refer to landscapes where human culture has greatly influenced the resulting biodiversity of a landscape. This study provides an overview of the SEPLs in the Philippine context. It reviews and furthers the inquiry in a previous study which identified examples of satoyama landscapes or SEPLs in the Philippines based on the main crop or dominant biodiversity. The objectives of the current paper are to present an updated list of SEPLs in the Philippines based on the main crop or dominant biodiversity; determine its status and problems; analyze its role in sustainable development and map future directions to sustain a harmonious human-nature relationship that would result to an abundance of biodiversity and overflowing ecosystem services. The local and international scientific literature on the status and problems of the identified SEPLs in the Philippines were reviewed. Results indicated that in addition to the three types identified by Buot and Osumi in 2004, nine more were included in this paper. The 12 SEPLs types identified were classified according to their main crop, namely: rice in muddy walled or stone-walled terraces; rice mixed with other crops; corn; vegetables, sweet potato, gabi/taro; cassava; coconut; coffee; cacao; tobacco; and rice-fish. These SEPLs contribute to various Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), either directly or indirectly. Incidentally, there are prevailing problems observed such as exploitation of natural resources due to the increasing population of migrants in the upland as a result of poverty. Simultaneously, the indigenous sustainable practices were weakened with the aging population while the youth showed a lack of interest in farming, leading to biodiversity loss and cultural erosion. Strategic actions including strengthening institutional partnerships, empowering indigenous communities, sustainable management of natural resources, and ensuring good governance and equitable sharing of resources are discussed. These steps will ensure biodiversity conservation and harmonious living in Philippine SEPLs.

Forests over limestone in Guiuan, Eastern Samar, the Philippines: Species composition and influencing environmental factors

“…The study of landscapes and seascapes have been quite interesting recently (Buot 2008(Buot , 2010(Buot , 2014IPSI 2014;Buot and Rabena 2020;Buot and Buhay 2022;Buot et al 2022a;Pungetti 2022). This is particularly eminent to working landscapes and seascapes, such as the Guiuan Marine Reserve Protected Landscape and Seascape (GMRPLS) in Samar Island, Central Philippines which has unique ecosystem of forests over limestone.…”

“…This is particularly eminent to working landscapes and seascapes, such as the Guiuan Marine Reserve Protected Landscape and Seascape (GMRPLS) in Samar Island, Central Philippines which has unique ecosystem of forests over limestone. These landscapes are closely associated with human activities (Buot and Osumi 2011;Sopsop and Buot 2013;Concepción et al 2015;Wardle 2016;Médail 2017;Buot and Buhay 2022). In many parts of southeast Asia, these landscapes and seascapes have been overutilized, resulting in the degradation of natural resources and hence the critical ecosystem services beneficial for the neighboring human communities (Buot and Osumi 2011;Huyen et al 2020;Buot and Buhay 2022;Pungetti 2022).…”

“…These landscapes are closely associated with human activities (Buot and Osumi 2011;Sopsop and Buot 2013;Concepción et al 2015;Wardle 2016;Médail 2017;Buot and Buhay 2022). In many parts of southeast Asia, these landscapes and seascapes have been overutilized, resulting in the degradation of natural resources and hence the critical ecosystem services beneficial for the neighboring human communities (Buot and Osumi 2011;Huyen et al 2020;Buot and Buhay 2022;Pungetti 2022). The presence of intensive human activities is an important part of this working landscape, or also known as the socioecological production landscape and seascape (SEPLS).…”