Reviewing two multimedia presentation (quasi-) standards

Rösch, Peter; Baentsch, Michael

doi:10.1109/mmsd.1996.557767

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although digital scanners (Table I) can be used to display many forms of black and white and color hard copy, they are relatively slow to produce images requiring high pixel resolutions such as photographs [8,11], and do not allow annotation or the display of three-dimensional objects, such as heart specimens, during morbidity and mortality conferences.…”

Section: Image Sources and Signal Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Filmless multimedia display following cardiac catheterization

Mathewson

1997

Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Image Sources and Signal Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Filmless multimedia display following cardiac catheterization

Mathewson

1997

Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…RSsch B~ntsch [26] reviewed the MHEG and HTML standards and came to a surprising conclusion: while MHEG as an elaborate standard offers a large number of concepts for compiling multimedia presentation its functionality can be prototyped in Java with a considerably lower effort. The consequences may be far-reaching as to how standards and their use will evolve.…”

Section: Mmsd'96 Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mmsd'96

Mühlhäuser¹

1996

SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multimedia imposes quite a number of specific issues and requirements on software. While system support for multimedia has been seriously investigated for several years now, the software engineering community has not yet reached a deep understanding of the impacts of multimedia on their field. MMSD'96 brought together a representative spectrum of researchers investigating this issue. Four general observations could be retained from their contributions: 1. distributed multimedia applications exploit both more long-term potentim and more persistent research problems than multimedia PC applications; 2. A reference model of multimedia software is not yet in reach; the large number of models proposed, even at MMSD, still lack better rationales, theoretic foundation, and convergence. 3. the MMSD community brings together people with a "document-background" and those with a "software background"; their views and approaches are still far from being harmonized. 4. While the multimedia community struggles for a common understanding among its members, it is in desperate need of a harmonization with approaches to distributed software development. In the remainder of this article, we will review issues to be addressed in the MMSD context, discuss the contributions made at the workshop itself, and draw conclusions for the state of the art.

show abstract

“…Rosch & Bantsch [24] review two standards and thus remain in the 'model' domain which relates directly to 'semantics', while the authoring support discussed by Leidig & Rosch [25] is clearly associated with the 'tools' class.…”

Section: Mmsd'96 Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Issues in multimedia software development

Mühlhäuser

Proceedings International Workshop on Multimedia Software Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multimedia has become a topic of high interest, and R&D contributions to multimedia fill piles of CD-ROMs, journals and books. Out in the jield, howevel; only a comparatively small set of out-of-the-box niche multimedia applications is used; developing customized multimedia applications, tuned to the needs of a particular organization, remains much of a myth, not to speak of integrated enterprises in which full-size multimedia information and communication is used throughout. The MMSD workshop has been organized as an attempt to help filling the gap between the availability of multimedia solutions and their customized, integrated use in the field. This introductory article positions MMSD in the range of multimedia R&D domains, recalls the categories of contributions relevant to sofhvare development in general ( 'solution space'), describes particular characteristics of multimedia software ('problem space') together with corresponding sample research contributions, and positions the contributions to the workshop in these spaces.

show abstract

Reviewing two multimedia presentation (quasi-) standards

Cited by 3 publications

References 9 publications

Filmless multimedia display following cardiac catheterization

Filmless multimedia display following cardiac catheterization

Mmsd'96

Issues in multimedia software development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About