2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0025100317000147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisions to the extIPA chart

Abstract: This paper describes changes to the extIPA (Extensions to the IPA) symbol set, the motivation for these changes, and areas where future changes by the IPA might be helpful to clinical transcribers. The extIPA symbol set was introduced some twenty-five years ago. Since that time, some minor changes have been introduced to the extIPA chart but no major rearrangement has been attempted. The 2010 Oslo meeting of ICPLA (International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association) started a revision of the extIPA c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For articulatory parameters, we devised a simple notation system to classify jaw and lip positions on a 4-point scale ranging from closed to wide open, rounded to unrounded, or retracted to protruded, respectively. We drew on principles applied to human vowels, inspired by the descriptive system of the International Phonetic Alphabet [ 26 ] ( figure 1 ). The human system considers jaw opening and lip rounding, and we additionally distinguished lip protrusion, because we noted that chimpanzees can modify rounding independently from protrusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For articulatory parameters, we devised a simple notation system to classify jaw and lip positions on a 4-point scale ranging from closed to wide open, rounded to unrounded, or retracted to protruded, respectively. We drew on principles applied to human vowels, inspired by the descriptive system of the International Phonetic Alphabet [ 26 ] ( figure 1 ). The human system considers jaw opening and lip rounding, and we additionally distinguished lip protrusion, because we noted that chimpanzees can modify rounding independently from protrusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process emulated a traditional in-clinic live transcription which, as identified previously, is known to be problematic for CLP speech. CT transcribed errors using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA, [33] and the Extensions to the IPA (ExtIPA, [34]) and then classified the errors as: 1. Correct; 2.…”
Section: Live Transcriptions/observations (Ct)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially the non-speechlike articulatory and airstream mechanisms required the use of diacritics. Neither the IPA nor the extIPA (Ball et al, 2018) provide a notation for lingual egressive articulations. Hence, the symbol for the corresponding click (always ingressive in speech) was used in combination with the symbol for an egressive airflow.…”
Section: Phonetic Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%