2022
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2022.2134424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting informal digital learning of English (IDLE): a structural equation modeling approach in a university EFL context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, learners who actively engage in IDLE experiences are likely to apply self-regulated learning strategies to effectively manage their informal learning activities. Such engagement in IDLE encourages learners to take responsibility for their learning, set goals, and monitor their progress, all of which align with the principles of self-regulated learning ( Zhang and Liu, 2022 ; Soyoof et al, 2023 ). As learners apply self-regulated learning strategies in their IDLE experiences, they develop a strong foundation of self-regulatory skills that can extend to their formal online courses ( Lee, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, learners who actively engage in IDLE experiences are likely to apply self-regulated learning strategies to effectively manage their informal learning activities. Such engagement in IDLE encourages learners to take responsibility for their learning, set goals, and monitor their progress, all of which align with the principles of self-regulated learning ( Zhang and Liu, 2022 ; Soyoof et al, 2023 ). As learners apply self-regulated learning strategies in their IDLE experiences, they develop a strong foundation of self-regulatory skills that can extend to their formal online courses ( Lee, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, despite considerable evidence supporting the positive impact of IDLE on language proficiency and cultural understanding, certain perspectives highlight potential limitations or contextual dependencies. Zhang and Liu (2022) underscored distinctions between form-focused and meaning-focused IDLE activities, suggesting that their effectiveness might be contingent upon learners’ preferences or specific learning contexts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rooted in the concepts of incidental language learning ( Saffran et al, 1997 ), learner autonomy ( Little, 2007 ), and informal language learning ( Bahrani and Sim, 2012 ), IDLE has emerged as a subfield of CALL in the language learning domain. IDLE is characterized by self-directed, informal English language learning that leverages a diverse range of digital devices, such as phones, computers, and laptops, as well as various resources like web applications and social media platforms, in informal settings ( Zhang and Liu, 2022 ; Taherian et al, 2023 ). It is important to note that IDLE encompasses both form-focused activities, such as vocabulary acquisition applications, and meaning-focused tasks, such as engaging in English language discussions through YouTube video commenting, outside the formal classroom environment ( Liu et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, as most research (e.g. Lee & Drajati, 2019;Lee & Lee, 2021;Zhang & Liu, 2022) only conceptualize and measure FLE, IDLE, and L2MSS following a positivist-oriented paradigm, there should be more studies undertaking a fine-grained and complete analysis to understand the empowering role of FLE and L2 motivation in IDLE across contexts. To address these gaps, this study adopts an explanatory mixed-method design that integrates the quantitative structural equation modeling analysis and the qualitative interview analysis.…”
Section: Identifying Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%