Revisiting the self-interest versus values debate: The role of temporal perspective

Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to Followers’ moral transgressions are determined by construal level mindset

“…Yet, we can deduce from the research referred to above that low construal level impedes the influence of moral principles -the abstractness of moral principles does not 'fit' low construal level (Eyal et al, 2008;Hunt et al, 2010). We argue that low construal level not only implies less influence of moral principles on behavior, but actually implies a negative view of such principles.…”

“…Gong & Medin, 2012. However, research shows that high construal level facilitates the influence of moral principles on behavior, whereas low construal level impedes this influence (see e.g., Eyal, Sagristano, Trope, Liberman, & Chaiken, 2009;Hunt et al, 2010). This is related to a phenomenon called 'construal level fit' (Lee, Keller, & Sternthal, 2010): people have a preference for information that fits their mindset -abstract information is GETTING IT DONE RIGHT 6 seen as more positive when people are in high construal level mindsets, and concrete information is perceived to be more positive when people are in low construal level mindsets (Berson, Halevy, Shamir, and Erez, 2014).…”

Paro y voto: ¿afecta al voto la experiencia de desempleo?

“…(3) Aunque se debe tener en cuenta que la mayoría de los estudios que han dado sustento empírico a estas tesis se refieren a Estados Unidos, en cuya cultura política tienen un especial predominio las orientaciones económicas individualistas (Feldman, 1982); que algunos de ellos han encontrado que bajo determinadas condiciones (información adecuada, «apuestas altas», inmediatez temporal; prioridad del tema en la agenda personal) y en ciertos contextos (situación material adversa) la relevancia política de las motivaciones autointeresadas es mayor (Chong et al, 2001;Kumlin, 2004;Lau y Heldman, 2009;Hunt et al, 2010;Young et al, 1987); y que el voto sociotrópico es compatible con una orientación egoísta, pues la clave de la distinción sociotrópico/egocéntrico es la información relevante y el objeto al que ésta se refiere, no la motivación de la acción (Kiewiet y Lewis-Beck, 2011).…”

Individual Attitudes Towards Trade: Stolper-Samuelson Revisited

“…The literature as it currently stands takes the view that both factors are potentially important, depending on how clear-cut the policy alternatives and implications are and how long the time horizon is to which these apply; see Chong et al (2001), , and Hunt et al (2010) as well as the references cited there. Admittedly, this paper takes an extreme view on this issue.…”