revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis

Westgate, Martin J.

doi:10.1002/jrsm.1374

Cited by 174 publications

(109 citation statements)

References 31 publications

(30 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

107

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, the metaverse project, 27 of which robvis is a part, has begun to curate a collection of R packages that cover different aspects of the systematic review and meta-analysis process which, when taken together, form a coherent endto-end open-source alternative to commercial offerings such as Covidence or Review Manager. Key offerings in this suite of packages include litsearcher, which facilitates systematic search strategy development, revtools, a package for managing the review process and performing title and abstract screening, metaDigitise, a package for automatic extraction of data from figures in research papers, and metafor, a package for conducting metaanalyses in R. [28][29][30][31] While robvis is a stable package, a range of additional functionality could be added. At present, the number of tools with a specific template included in robvis is limited-adding additional templates is a priority.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments

McGuinness

Higgins

2020

Research Synthesis Methods

2,504

1,337

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite a major increase in the range and number of software offerings now available to help researchers produce evidence syntheses, there is currently no generic tool for producing figures to display and explore the risk-of-bias assessments that routinely take place as part of systematic review. However, tools such as the R programming environment and Shiny (an R package for building interactive web apps) have made it straightforward to produce new tools to help in producing evidence syntheses. We present a new tool, robvis (Risk-Of-Bias VISualization), available as an R package and web app, which facilitates rapid production of publication-quality risk-of-bias assessment figures. We present a timeline of the tool's development and its key functionality.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments

McGuinness

Higgins

2020

Research Synthesis Methods

2,504

1,337

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We exported records and relevant metadata from each database. We removed duplicates using the revtools package (Westgate, 2019). To find unpublished studies, we sent a call to the mailing lists of several professional organizations (see SOM).…”

Section: Search Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta-Analysis of the “Ironic” Effects of Intergroup Contact

Nk¹,

Nk²

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Growing evidence suggests that intergroup contact, psychology’s most-researched paradigm for reducing prejudice, has the ‘ironic’ effect of reducing support for social change in disadvantaged groups. We conducted a preregistered meta-analytic test of this effect across 98 studies with 140 samples of 213,085 disadvantaged-group members. As predicted, intergroup contact was, on average, associated with less perceived injustice (r = −.07), collective action (r = −.06), and support for reparative policies (r = −.07). However, these associations were small, variable, and consistent with alternative explanations. Across outcomes, 25–36% of studies found positive associations with intergroup contact. Moderator analyses explained about a third of the between-sample variance, showing that, on average, associations were negative only in studies of adults that measured intergroup contact directly and were strongest in studies that examined short-term migration or (post-)colonial intergroup relations. We also found evidence for an alternative explanation for the apparent ‘ironic’ effects of intergroup contact as, after controlling for the positive association of negative contact with support for social change, positive contact was no longer associated with any of the outcomes. We close by discussing strengths and limitations of the available evidence and by highlighting open questions about the relationship between intergroup contact and support for social change in disadvantaged groups.

show abstract

“…These searches included studies published through July 2020. The revtools package in R (Westgate 2019) was used to identify 475 nonduplicated studies through these additional database searches, which were then examined for suitability. A second gray-literature search resulted in 350 additional works between 2018 and 2020.…”

Section: Search Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effectiveness of using targeted grazing for vegetation management: a meta‐analysis

Marchetto

Wolf

Larkin

2021

Restoration Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of targeted grazing to control undesired plants as a component of ecological restoration is gaining in popularity, but there is considerable uncertainty among land managers about the effectiveness of this approach. We synthesized existing literature on the use of livestock (ruminants, swine, and equids) to control undesired plants using a meta-analysis to address questions about the effectiveness of the approach. Seventy studies matched our inclusion criteria; these comprised 86% peerreviewed journal articles and 14% gray literature. Studies were conducted in 17 countries but highly concentrated in the United States and Europe. Cattle, goats, horses, and sheep were used for vegetation management in the studies. Most target plant species were nonnative perennial forbs. Median study duration was 3 years, with a maximum of 10 years. We found that, overall, the use of targeted grazing significantly reduced undesired plants and significantly increased plant species richness. However, several important questions remain. In particular, further research is needed to differentiate temporary defoliation from actual plant mortality, to separate the contributions of native versus nonnative species to gains in plant species richness, and to address longer term outcomes following grazing cessation.

show abstract

revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis

Cited by 174 publications

References 31 publications

Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments

Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments

Meta-Analysis of the “Ironic” Effects of Intergroup Contact

The effectiveness of using targeted grazing for vegetation management: a meta‐analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About