1965
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.15.6.507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheoencephalography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our REG results are consistent with published literature [13][14][15]. Data were not evaluated for failed tests (Table 2), which include those with no results or where data could not be evaluated due to artifacts, which occurred for all modalities (with variability; among the modalities, REG was the most sensitive to artifacts).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our REG results are consistent with published literature [13][14][15]. Data were not evaluated for failed tests (Table 2), which include those with no results or where data could not be evaluated due to artifacts, which occurred for all modalities (with variability; among the modalities, REG was the most sensitive to artifacts).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…At the same time, these changes can cause an increase in intracranial pressure and a resulting decrease in CBF. In studies of REG conducted earlier, REG was determined to be useful for detecting elevated ICP and arteriosclerosis [15]. An overview of REG can be found elsewhere [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], however the relationship between REG and CBF AR was missing [8,9,11,12].…”
Section: Medical Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their statement that the imped ance values for the surface electrode-to-electrolyte interface exceeded the under lying tissue resistance of the brain has been challenged by Kinnen (1969a, b) and the model constructed by Seipel (1967) further refutes this. Finally it has been claimed that some examples of intracerebral pathology are not always revealed by rheoencephalography (Perez-Borja and Meyer, 1964;Waltz and Ray, 1967;Masucci et al, 1970) but there have been successful efforts to do so (McHenry, 1965;Seipel, 1967;Hadjiev, \912\Jacquy et al, 1974). Seipel (1967) found this to be the case for 95% of his 136 REG recordings, while Hadjiev (1972) has reviewed the world literature covering a large number of such investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%