2017
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheumatoid arthritis-specific cardiovascular risk scores are not superior to general risk scores: a validation analysis of patients from seven countries

Abstract: The QRISK2, EULAR multiplier and ERS-RA algorithms did not predict CVD risk more accurately in patients with RA than CVD risk calculators developed for the general population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The 10‐year risk of cardiovascular disease from the Framingham Heart Study was used to determine cardiovascular risk in our study population. Although RA‐specific cardiovascular risk algorithms have been developed over the last years, their clinical utility is still debatable, as they do not seem to predict cardiovascular risk more accurately in patients with RA, compared to the general population cardiovascular risk calculators, including Framingham Risk Score . The 10‐year general cardiovascular risk was calculated using the relevant calculator from the Framingham Heart Study based on sex, age, systolic blood pressure, treatment for hypertension, smoking, diabetes, HDL and total cholesterol levels …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10‐year risk of cardiovascular disease from the Framingham Heart Study was used to determine cardiovascular risk in our study population. Although RA‐specific cardiovascular risk algorithms have been developed over the last years, their clinical utility is still debatable, as they do not seem to predict cardiovascular risk more accurately in patients with RA, compared to the general population cardiovascular risk calculators, including Framingham Risk Score . The 10‐year general cardiovascular risk was calculated using the relevant calculator from the Framingham Heart Study based on sex, age, systolic blood pressure, treatment for hypertension, smoking, diabetes, HDL and total cholesterol levels …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, traditional cardiovascular risk models including the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), Framingham risk score (FRS), Reynolds risk score (RRS), and 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association CVD Risk Score do not sufficiently stratify rheumatoid arthritis patients according to risk 147148149. Efforts have been made to develop novel cardiovascular disease risk models for use in rheumatoid arthritis,150151 or to modify existing models with a correction factor for rheumatoid arthritis,152 but these novel indices failed to outperform general population models in limited external validation testing 151153. Further assessments of these models will be critical to determining the optimal risk model for regular clinical use.…”
Section: Management and Prevention Of Cardiovascular Disease In Rheummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, patients with RA with cardiovascular disease may not have symptoms [48,70,71]. Using the classic Framingham risk equation (based on age, sex, total cholesterol level, high density lipoprotein cholesterol level, smoking history, and systolic blood pressure), patients with RA, SPA, and SLE may fall into a low risk category, leading some to add the presence of a systemic inflammatory disease such as RA, SPA, and SLE to the list of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, or to add a multiplication factor of 1.4 to the calculation of cardiac risk, recognizing that the current risk assessment tools are unreliable and underestimate cardiac risk in patients with RA, SPA, and SLE [51,[72][73][74][75][76]. Major orthopedic surgery is categorized as an intermediate risk procedure in the ACA/AHA guideline, and carries a 1-5% risk of MI or cardiovascular death [68].…”
Section: Major Acute Cardiac Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%