2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhizosphere effects on soil solution composition and mineral stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Area A has a higher pH value of the surface sediment than area B (Tables 1 and 2). The difference could be because of the denser vegetation cover in area B and the existence of root acids from the root zone of plants (Kim et al 2010a, b;McGahan et al 2014). The salts of the alkaline hydrolysis accumulate at the 50 cm depth of the profile, which can also be explained by the denser vegetation cover of area B compared to area A.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Area A has a higher pH value of the surface sediment than area B (Tables 1 and 2). The difference could be because of the denser vegetation cover in area B and the existence of root acids from the root zone of plants (Kim et al 2010a, b;McGahan et al 2014). The salts of the alkaline hydrolysis accumulate at the 50 cm depth of the profile, which can also be explained by the denser vegetation cover of area B compared to area A.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rhizosphere is the most biologically and chemically active frontier of the soil (McNear, 2013) because this is where compounds are released which directly and indirectly affect soil minerals (Philippot et al, 2013). Specifically, roots provide carbon for the microbial and fungal communities (Berner et al, 2003;Calvaruso et al, 2009Calvaruso et al, , 2014McGahan et al, 2014). In return, mycorrhizal fungi and associated bacteria generally increase the availability of nutrients to the trees (e.g., van Scholl et al, 2006a, b;Balogh-Brunstad et al, 2008a;Calvaruso et al, 2009;Bonneville et al, 2011;Smits et al, 2012;Ahmed and Holmstrom, 2015).…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest conversion for agriculture may have diverse direct and indirect consequences on soil physico-chemical properties, and their variation over the hillslopes, due to changes in plant-soil interactions and nutrient exchange, agricultural practices, soil hydrology and geomorphic process rates. Anthropogenic land cover change modifies the nutrient uptake by plants and rhizosphere processes and may influence mineral weathering directly (e.g., Baker, 1973;Schnitzer and Kodama, 1976;Drever, 1994;Lucas, 2001;Velde and Meunier, 2008;McGahan et al, 2014). Through the input of fertilisers, agricultural practices may affect soil acidity and clay mineralogy (e.g., Barak et al, 1997;Velde and Peck, 2002;Velde and Meunier, 2008;Simonsson et al, 2009;Cornu et al, 2012;Matocha et al, 2016;Moterle et al, 2016), with potential implications on soil mineral weathering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%