Ricerche sulla protostoria della Sibaritide, 2

Bergonzi, Giovanna; Buffa, Vittoria; Cardarelli, Andrea; Giardino, Claudio; Peroni, Renato; Vagnetti, Lucía

doi:10.4000/books.pcjb.1238

Cited by 21 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Layer 1B, which was situated directly above the floor, is to be associated with the period of use of the building, while layer 1A probably constitutes a fill dating to the period after the abandonment of the building, but joints connect it to layer 1B. Bergonzi & Cardarelli 1982a;Peroni 1984, 17;Peroni & Trucco 1994, 32-36;Trucco 1994, 97-99. 41 Bergonzi & Cardarelli 1982b, 47;1984, 151;Capofieri & Giardino 1984a, 58;Belardelli 1994, 270;Giardino 1994a, 185-195;Tenaglia 1994, 347. 42 Peroni 1982b1984b, 19-27;Barbieri, Peroni & Trucco 1984, 15-28.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Use and Appreciation of Mycenaean Pottery in the Levant, Cyprus and Italy : (ca. 1600-1200 BC)

Wijngaarden¹,

Jan²

2002

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A m s t e r dam U n i v e r s i ty P r e s s All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. ISO 9706C o n t e n t s p r e fac eThe present monograph is a revised version of a dissertation written for the department of Classical Archaeology at the University of Amsterdam. The research was made possible by a generous scholarship from the UTOPA foundation. I would like to express my gratitude to the director, Mr L. Dijkman, for providing me with this opportunity and for his pleasant cooperation over the years. The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) made a travel grant available which allowed me to visit many of the places mentioned in this volume. A publication grant, supplied by the same organisation, made the publication of this book possible.This study could not have been completed without the active support of a number of friends. Over the years, Professor Joost Crouwel has read my work with alacrity and care. His detailed knowledge of a range of archaeological topics, as well as his consistent emphasis on clarity have contributed greatly to the results of my research. His academic rigour and in his enthusiasm have been a particular source of inspiration.In the initial phases of my research, the late Vronwy Hankey helped me define the directions and the limitations of my research. My discussions with Vronwy provided an insight into the enormous complexity of the field I was about to enter. I consider myself fortunate to have been one of the many who were able to benefit from her kindness and expertise.Dr Lucia Vagnetti kindly assisted me with the parts of this study that deal with the central Mediterranean. She also pointed me in the right direction when I was in Italy. Similarly, Professor Albert Leonard helped me with the sections on the Levant and Cyprus. I would like to express my gratitude to both scholars for sharing their expertise and for taking the time to read lengthy instalments.A number of colleagues have discussed their work with me, shown me sites and material, and have given their views on parts of my research. In particular, I would like to thank Dr P. Attema, Dr M. Bettelli, Dr H. Catling, Dr N. Hirschfeld, Dr B. Kling, Dr G. van der Kooij, Dr S. Levi, Professor M. Marazzi, Mr G. Matteo and Professor R. Peroni.I would also like to thank Professor N. Roymans, who agreed to include this work in the Amsterdam Archaeological Studies. In addition, the staff at Amsterdam University Press, particularly W. Poelstra and J. Wagenaar, have assisted me in many ways.Finally, my heartfelt thanks go to my parents, Corrie and Jan van Wijngaarden, and to my wife Virna. Without their enduring encouragement and ceaseless support, this book would never have been completed. 1 Dicki...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Use and Appreciation of Mycenaean Pottery in the Levant, Cyprus and Italy : (ca. 1600-1200 BC)

Wijngaarden¹,

Jan²

2002

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One of these regions was the head of the Adriatic in northeastern Italy, where large elite settlements such as Frattesina housed craft specialists working in pottery, textiles, metal and an array of prestige goods such as glass-paste -and even elephant ivory (Bietti Sestieri and De Grossi Mazzorin, 1995) -and were in part sustained by foodstuffs supplied by neighbouring communities that were probably in some kind of client relationship (Bietti Sestieri, 1981;1985-6;Clark, 1986). A rather similar regional hierarchy has been found along the Ionian coast, the instep of the peninsula (Bergonzi, 1985;Peroni, 1984a;1984b): cemeteries indicate hierarchies of warriors, craftspeople and commoners, and the settlement of Broglio was a centre of craft production like Frattesina, in this case including wheel-made pottery copying Aegean wares, as well as of an agricultural regime that included olive and vine cultivation. Settlement structures in Sicily seem to have been comparable at this time (Malone, Stoddart and Whitehouse, 1994;Leighton, 1996b).…”

Section: Bronze Age Societies In the Second Millennium Bcmentioning

confidence: 83%

Hunting and farming in prehistoric Italy: changing perspectives on landscape and society

Barker¹

1999

Pap. Br. Sch. Rome

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CACCIA E ALLEVAMENTO NELL'ITALIA PREISTORICA: CAMBIAMENTI DI PROSPETTIVA SUL TERRITORIO E SULLA SOCIETÀQuest'articolo riassume come due decadi di ricerca sull'Italia preistorica abbiano cambiato la nostra comprensione della natura degli antichi sistemi di caccia e di allevamento, della transizione dall'uno all'altro sistema, dei territori che queste attività hanno aiutato a creare e delle società di cui esse facevano parte. Per quanto riguarda la preistoria più antica, è ora più chiaro che per un lungo periodo l'umanità dell'epoca si fosse basata su un sistema di ‘scavenging’, vale a dire di nutrimento basato sull'utilizzo di carogne di animali morti. La variabilità dei sistemi di caccia che funsero da complemento allo ‘scavenging’, e che infine lo sostituirono, si è andata anch'essa man mano chiarendo. L'evidenza di un protaersi del processo di transizione nell'Olocene dalla caccia, pesca e raccolta all'agricoltura si è andata accumulando in maniera ancora più evidente, sebbene i motivi di questa transizione ci rimangono oscuri. Le società agricole del tardo neolitico furono sempre più caratterizzate da competizione sociale, in particolare tra gli uomini, mentre il commercio a lunga distanza e gli elementi rituali fmirono con lo svolgere un ruolo sempre più importante nei meccanismi di riproduzione sociale. L'età del rame vide un incremento nella specializzazione agricola e nella produzione artigianale mentre famiglie rivali erano in competizione per il controllo delle risorse. La prima parte dell'età del bronzo rappresenta un periodo di espansione degli insediamenti e di intensificazione della sussistenza, ma probabilmente anche di frammentazione sociale. Nel tardo bronzo e nell'età del ferro alcune regioni divennero centri significativi di poteri locali, nonchè il fulcro di reti di scambi locali e regionali di prodotti agrieoli e artigianali che sostenevano la struttura di queste società attraverso il mantenimento di debiti ed altri vincoli.

show abstract

“…1998; Peroni and Vanzetti 1998; Levi 1999; Peroni 2000; Bettelli 2002). By contrast, Rosa Russa is a ‘minor’ site on a small terrace, investigated only by survey, which was occupied during the Middle Bronze Age and abandoned during the Recent Bronze Age (Bergonzi et al . 1982, 168–78; Peroni and Trucco 1994, 776–8).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technology Transfer at the Periphery of the Mycenaean World: The Cases of Mycenaean Pottery Found in Central Macedonia (Greece) and the Plain of Sybaris (Italy)*

et al. 2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study of technology transfer in pottery production to the periphery of the Mycenaean world has been addressed by considering two different areas, Southern Italy and Central Macedonia. Technological features such as ceramic paste, decoration and firing, have been determined for different ceramic groups established according to provenance criteria. The studies of technology and provenance have been performed following an archaeometric approach using neutron activation analysis, petrographic analysis, x-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy.The results have revealed the existence of two different models. On the one hand, Southern Italy seems to exhibit a more organised pottery production, which follows a Mycenaean-like technology, while in Central Macedonia production is probably more varied, in part based on the technology of the local tradition.

show abstract

Ricerche sulla protostoria della Sibaritide, 2

Cited by 21 publications

References 0 publications

Use and Appreciation of Mycenaean Pottery in the Levant, Cyprus and Italy : (ca. 1600-1200 BC)

Use and Appreciation of Mycenaean Pottery in the Levant, Cyprus and Italy : (ca. 1600-1200 BC)

Hunting and farming in prehistoric Italy: changing perspectives on landscape and society

Technology Transfer at the Periphery of the Mycenaean World: The Cases of Mycenaean Pottery Found in Central Macedonia (Greece) and the Plain of Sybaris (Italy)*

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About