2014
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00012914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right ventricular reverse remodelling after balloon pulmonary angioplasty

Abstract: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has been reported to improve haemodynamics and functional capacity, with an acceptable risk, in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) who are not candidates for pulmonary endarterectomy. However, right ventricular (RV) function, an important predictor in CTEPH, remains to be elucidated. We aimed to examine the impact of BPA on RV remodelling and dysfunction relative to haemodynamic improvements in patients with inoperable CTEPH.20 consecutive pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
130
2
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
14
130
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…BPA was first used for inoperable CTEPH in the 1990 s, 22 and is now widely performed in Japan. 4-6, 23 Indeed, BPA dramatically improves not only pulmonary hemodynamics but also functional status, exercise capacity and right ventricular functions, 5, 22-24 which was also confirmed in the present study.…”
Section: Bpa Strategy Has a Positive Impact On Inoperable Ctephsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…BPA was first used for inoperable CTEPH in the 1990 s, 22 and is now widely performed in Japan. 4-6, 23 Indeed, BPA dramatically improves not only pulmonary hemodynamics but also functional status, exercise capacity and right ventricular functions, 5, 22-24 which was also confirmed in the present study.…”
Section: Bpa Strategy Has a Positive Impact On Inoperable Ctephsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…27 In the present study, we were able to demonstrate that BPA improves not only RV function but also LV function in CTEPH patients. The discrepancy in the effects of BPA on LV remodeling between the two studies could be explained by the facts that in the Fukui et al study, the hemodynamic improvement by BPA was not complete (mean PA pressure, from 39.4±7.6 to 27.3±8.5 mmHg, P<0.001) and the time from the final BPA session to CMR was short (4.0±0.8 months), 27 whereas in the present study, hemodynamic improvement was complete ( Table 2) and the duration between the final BPA session and CMR was relatively long (9.0±8.7 months). Pressure overload and remodeling in the RV could cause LV dysfunction through ventricular interaction, ventricular interdependence, leftward septal shift and RV hypertrophy.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Published studies of BPA are discussed below and summarised in table 1 [9,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]43]. The first full report was published in 2001 by FEINSTEIN et al [15] in the USA, describing 18 patients with inaccessible or "nonsurgical" CTEPH.…”
Section: History Evolution and Evidence For Bpamentioning
confidence: 99%