2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk analysis and assessment in the worksites using the fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process and a quantitative technique – A case study for the Greek construction sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Accident risks (e.g., risks of collision, impact, and fall), physical risks (e.g., risks of physical strain or consumption and being crushed), and environmental risks (e.g., risks of exposure to or contact with extreme temperatures, electric currents, and hazardous substances) are the three layers of the hierarchical structure of construction site safety 9 ) . To assess the need for information management, six items of the control category (i.e., occupational safety and health knowledge, policies, efficiency, productivity, collaboration, and funding) and five items of the mechanism category (i.e., professionalism, equipment, materials, time, and space) were used as components of functional modeling to summarize the decision-making mechanism regarding electrical safety on construction sites and the work characteristics related to electrical hazards 3 , 28 ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accident risks (e.g., risks of collision, impact, and fall), physical risks (e.g., risks of physical strain or consumption and being crushed), and environmental risks (e.g., risks of exposure to or contact with extreme temperatures, electric currents, and hazardous substances) are the three layers of the hierarchical structure of construction site safety 9 ) . To assess the need for information management, six items of the control category (i.e., occupational safety and health knowledge, policies, efficiency, productivity, collaboration, and funding) and five items of the mechanism category (i.e., professionalism, equipment, materials, time, and space) were used as components of functional modeling to summarize the decision-making mechanism regarding electrical safety on construction sites and the work characteristics related to electrical hazards 3 , 28 ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, due to the fuzzy nature of the decisionmaking process, they cannot express their opinions clearly and explicitly (Koulinas et al, 2019). Hence, the next contribution of this study was to use fuzzy AHP and fuzzy ANP models to determine the most appropriate business strategy.…”
Section: Comparison Of Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kramar and Topolsek (2018), Tang and Hsu (2018) used FAHP to evaluate the critical element of marketing strategic alliance development in the mobile telecommunication industry. Also, it was used to model the risk analysis and assessment of construction sites in Greece (Koulinas et al, 2019). A closed example application of FAHP in environmental management is in Choubin et al (2019) where it was applied in the analysis of gully erosion susceptibility.…”
Section: Overview Of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%