Risk Assessment and Risk Governance of Liquefied Natural Gas Development in Gladstone, Australia

Abstract

This article is a retrospective analysis of liquefied natural gas development (LNG) in Gladstone, Australia by using the structure of the risk governance framework developed by the International Risk Governance Council (IRGC). Since 2010 the port of Gladstone has undergone extensive expansion to facilitate the increasing coal export as well as the new development of three recently completed LNG facilities. Significant environmental and socio-economic impacts and concerns have occurred as a result of these developments. The overall aim of the article, therefore, is to identify the risk governance deficits that arose and to formulate processes capable of improving similar decision-making problems in the future. The structure of the IRGC framework is followed because it represents a broad analytical approach for considering risk assessment and risk governance in Gladstone in ways that include, but also go beyond, the risk approach of the ISO 31000:2009 standard that was employed at the time. The IRGC risk framework is argued to be a consistent and comprehensive risk governance framework that integrates scientific, economic, social, and cultural aspects and advocates the notion of inclusive risk governance through stakeholder communication and involvement. Key aspects related to risk preassessment, risk appraisal, risk tolerability and acceptability, risk management, and stakeholder communication and involvement are considered. The results indicate that the risk governance deficits include aspects related to (i) the risk matrix methodology, (ii) reflecting uncertainties, (iii) cumulative risks, (iv) the regulatory process, and (v) stakeholder communication and involvement.

Evaluation of error across natural gas pipeline incidents

“…The last 30 years of scholarship on organizational failure have articulated the nature of error as structural managerial factors, company cultures, and incentive schemes (van Dyck et al., 2005). This scholarship stands in contrast to any notion that error that precipitates disaster being natural or unexplainable outside of individual human behavioral tendencies (Chmutina & von Meding, 2019; Grabowski & Roberts, 2006; Kunreuther & Linnerooth, 1984; Noonan, 1991; van der Vegt, 2018). Such investigations have problematized instances where the individual's actions are central to the description, investigation, and determination of causation of significant events (Gronewold et al., 2013).…”

Unmanned Remotely Operated Search and Rescue Ships in the Canadian Arctic: Exploring the Opportunities, Risk Dimensions and Governance Implications

“…Even if the federal government approves the operation of RO-SARS, other Arctic states might not welcome the novel technology in waters under their sovereignty or jurisdiction for safety and security reasons (Lee et al 2018 ). Accordingly, political and social license in and between neighbouring Arctic states, territories, Indigenous peoples and northern communities is important (van der Vegt 2018 ). Without their support, the deployment of both RO-SARS and remote control centres in the North could face obstacles.…”