2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment by failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) using an interval number based logistic regression model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still on the calculation of the RPN in the FMEA, mistakes can occur due to the inversely proportional meaning of the classification categories for the probability of detection and occurrence; different scores can originate the same RPN with the risk of not expressing the magnitude of the failure. 19,22 In this way, one of the members should be familiar with the tool of choice in order to lead the others to the correct use and clarification. 20,25 More recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of the tools to evaluate work processes and raise the errors that can directly harm patient safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Still on the calculation of the RPN in the FMEA, mistakes can occur due to the inversely proportional meaning of the classification categories for the probability of detection and occurrence; different scores can originate the same RPN with the risk of not expressing the magnitude of the failure. 19,22 In this way, one of the members should be familiar with the tool of choice in order to lead the others to the correct use and clarification. 20,25 More recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of the tools to evaluate work processes and raise the errors that can directly harm patient safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sub-processes should be evaluated in order to filter more precisely all the failures 20 after selecting a multidisciplinary team, knowledgeable of the process, to identify the causes that may lead to risk or damage, prioritizing corrective measures. 20,22,23 The team should have a leader, who will present the tool and guide the other members, and an expert in the tool for clarifications. 16,20 Everyone will be able to change the steps of the work diagram as needed.…”
Section: Failure Mode and Effects Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of RPN has been a matter of discussion and is known to present certain limitations pointed out in the literature. RPN can be obtained for different ratings of S, O and D, owing to the same weight of the three components (Sawhney et al, 2010); however, there is difficulty faced by decision makers in processing uncertain information (Karimi and Pasandideh, 2018) since RPN is not sufficiently dynamic in priority ranking of failure modes (Bhattacharjee et al, 2020). Improvements in the determination of RPN have been proposed by Nguyen et al (2016aNguyen et al ( , 2016b through the modified RPN and extended RPN, where the internal and external costs of the failures are used to calculate the RPN.…”
Section: Rpn = S O D × ×mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in the determination of RPN have been proposed by Nguyen et al (2016aNguyen et al ( , 2016b through the modified RPN and extended RPN, where the internal and external costs of the failures are used to calculate the RPN. Bhattacharjee et al (2020) proposed an interval numberbased logistic regression approach for the estimation of RPN. Cao and Deng (2019) used geometric mean to combine several probability distributions based on the information quality to calculate the RPN.…”
Section: Rpn = S O D × ×mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMEA members have difficulty in obtaining accurate values of risk factors. 9,10 Second, default weights of risk indicators are the same when sorting failure modes. However, weights of risk factors may be remarkably different when evaluating different objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%