2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01016-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factor analysis of Swedish Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption is supported by data published by Russo et al 100 and Nativi et al 89 The same assumption has been made in previous economic analyses. 30,98 l In our base-case analysis < 1% of patients are alive supported by a VAD beyond 70 months.…”
Section: Model Assumptions -Transition Probabilitiessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The assumption is supported by data published by Russo et al 100 and Nativi et al 89 The same assumption has been made in previous economic analyses. 30,98 l In our base-case analysis < 1% of patients are alive supported by a VAD beyond 70 months.…”
Section: Model Assumptions -Transition Probabilitiessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although there was a survival advantage demonstrated in the REMATCH study, the outcomes led many to question whether the increased length of life was worth the expense to both the patients and the health care system. Another factor is age, which has consistently been identified in multiple studies as a risk factor for decreased survival and increased adverse events after LVAD placement (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). However, these previous studies have significant limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older patients (age Ն70 years) are the largest potential group who could benefit from LVAD support, yet advanced age has consistently been identified as a risk factor for poor outcome (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). These studies have several limitations: 1) use of proven inferior technology (pulsatile devices); 2) registry data of LVADs in patients with diverse indications (i.e., failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass, deterioration while awaiting transplantation, and ongoing cardiogenic shock); and 3) data from a variety of mixed lowvolume and high-volume centers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar rate was reported by Granfeldt in a report of a Swedish centre experience using a range of devices. 39 Right heart failure requiring right ventricular assist device (RVAD) support was reported in 5% of HeartMate and Novacor cases in the study that compared these devices, 14 and in 7% 21 to 12% 22 of other HeartMate series. Right heart failure requiring right ventricular assistance or exhibiting symptoms of severe dysfunction was reported in 21% (7/34) of HeartMate patients in one centre.…”
Section: Adverse Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%