2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Banff Borderline Acute Rejection in Protocol Biopsies and Effect on Renal Graft Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seron et al found no difference in serum creatinine at 1 and 2 years posttransplant between patients (n = 98) with normal histology and borderline changes at protocol biopsies performed at around 3 months . In contrast, Espinoza et al found a higher serum creatinine and greater decline in GFR at 2 years in subjects who had borderline changes in protocol biopsies done at 1 year . Some other studies have also shown similar findings …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Seron et al found no difference in serum creatinine at 1 and 2 years posttransplant between patients (n = 98) with normal histology and borderline changes at protocol biopsies performed at around 3 months . In contrast, Espinoza et al found a higher serum creatinine and greater decline in GFR at 2 years in subjects who had borderline changes in protocol biopsies done at 1 year . Some other studies have also shown similar findings …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…found no differences in allograft function at one- and 2-years post-transplantation between patients with and without SCI at 3-months post-transplantation [ 41 ]. Conversely, others found an impaired GFR at 2-years post-transplantation in SCI patients compared with normal biopsies [ 6 , 28 , 42 ]. Finally, a small randomized clinical trial, performed in low-immunological-risk KT recipients under TAC-based immunosuppression, showed a modest greater degree of fibrosis at 1 year in the CSW group, but more detailed information on SCI was not provided [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Banff score classifies biopsies with inflammation (i) ≥ 2 and tubulitis (t) ≥ 2 as acute cellular rejection, but i1 and t1 scores are also predictive, especially, if they are combined with other markers of injury. Borderline changes (defined by t > 0 without a diagnosis of acute rejection) are associated with a poorer outcome [36], and with a positive response to antirejection therapy in the context of allograft dysfunction. Mild or focal interstitial inflammation may only lead to a poorer outcome when associated with tubulitis [37].…”
Section: Fibrogenic Graft Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%