2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12185-014-1536-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric patients with hematological malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, none of the patients were obese/overweight. 17 In another cohort of childhood-transplanted patients, 15% of 45 patients showed abnormal glucose tolerance but only 1 was obese. However, a waist/height ratio of 40.5 was associated with abnormal glucose tolerance in 85%, compared with 42% of patients with normal glucose tolerance, and 23% of controls.…”
Section: Transplant-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, none of the patients were obese/overweight. 17 In another cohort of childhood-transplanted patients, 15% of 45 patients showed abnormal glucose tolerance but only 1 was obese. However, a waist/height ratio of 40.5 was associated with abnormal glucose tolerance in 85%, compared with 42% of patients with normal glucose tolerance, and 23% of controls.…”
Section: Transplant-related Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These findings were not confirmed by other studies, in which only age 46 years at the time of HSCT in a pediatric cohort was associated with increased risk of PTDM/impaired glucose tolerance. 17 …”
Section: Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One group evaluates only patients with malignant hematologic (MaHe) condition and the other group for all other conditions. The MaHe group (Hoffmeister et al, 2004;Oudin et al, 2011;Hirabayashi et al, 2014;Oudin et al, 2015) has the pooled MD of 4.98, 95% CI1.85-13.42, I 2 =0% and the other studies with pooled MD of 5.55, 95% CI 2.02-15.25, I 2 =95.4% (Taskinen et al, 2000;Neville et al, 2006;Baker et al, 2007;Meacham et al, 2010;Armenian et al, 2012;Nakagawa et al, 2018;Shalitin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for the study designs, we categorized the studies into prospective, cross-sectional and retrospective studies and found the following pooled MD: 3.21, 95% CI 1.53-6.73, I 2 =71.3% for retrospective studies (Hoffmeister et al, 2004;Baker et al, 2007;Armenian et al, 2012;Hirabayashi et al, 2014;Shalitin et al, 2018) while for prospective study the pool MD was 12.75, 8.77-18.53, I 2 =16.3%, and 6.76, 95% CI 3.32-13.74, I 2 =0% for cross-sectional studies (Taskinen et al, 2000;Meacham et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation