2012
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120919-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Failed Closed Reduction of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures

Abstract: The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures at a Level I trauma center. Data were analyzed to identify risk factors associated with closed reduction failure. Closed pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures that were treated at the authors' trauma center between October 1997 and January 2009 were reviewed. The main outcome variable was necessity of open reduction. To determine which factors were independently associated with a failed closed reduction, a mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pin site infection was the most frequent complication of the treatment of these fractures [11,13,20,21]. The reported rate of pin site infection ranged from 3.7% to 17.0% [11,13,14,22]. The incidence of it in our study was 8.4% (5/59), within the scope of rate reported in the previous papers [11,13,14,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Pin site infection was the most frequent complication of the treatment of these fractures [11,13,20,21]. The reported rate of pin site infection ranged from 3.7% to 17.0% [11,13,14,22]. The incidence of it in our study was 8.4% (5/59), within the scope of rate reported in the previous papers [11,13,14,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The reported rate of pin site infection ranged from 3.7% to 17.0% [11,13,14,22]. The incidence of it in our study was 8.4% (5/59), within the scope of rate reported in the previous papers [11,13,14,22]. Moreover, malunion was another common complication, but there was significant variation among the different studies ranging from 1.0% to 20.8% [2,11,13,22,23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 38%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous series show the rate of open reduction for failed closed treatment ranging from 0.46% to 46% with current studies placing the rate at about 13%. 19 The experience in this series of 7% is consistent with previously reported. Open treatment was secondary to failed closed reduction in 50% of the cases in the open treatment group, whereas the remaining patients were treated with planned rigid-fixation constructs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%