2017
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000001962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage After Cesarean Delivery: Case-Control Studies

Abstract: Background Women who undergo intrapartum caesarean delivery (CD) are at increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) compared to those undergoing prelabor CD. To determine whether the presence and strength of the associations between individual risk factors and severe PPH vary among women undergoing prelabor CD or intrapartum CD, stratified analyses are needed according to CD subtype. Methods To identify risk factors for severe PPH within two distinct CD populations: prelabor CD and intrapartum CD, we perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
71
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
15
71
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Women with a past history of PPH were more likely to experience PPH than others [11]. Obstetric factors are another compounding factors that increase the risk for PPH; such as multiple pregnancy [12,13] and the baby weight of 4000 g or more [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women with a past history of PPH were more likely to experience PPH than others [11]. Obstetric factors are another compounding factors that increase the risk for PPH; such as multiple pregnancy [12,13] and the baby weight of 4000 g or more [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include previous cesarean delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, fibroids, placenta previa, etc. [4,[9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cohorts were sourced from prior case-control studies examining risk factors for PPH during prelabor CD and intrapartum CD. 18 The study was approved by the Stanford University IRB (Protocol ID=25236).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%