2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A multivariate analysis

Abstract: Adverse outcome from LC is particularly associated with male gender, but also the patient's co-morbidity, complexity and urgency of surgery. Risk-adjusted outcome analysis is desirable to ensure an informed consent process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
53
4
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
8
53
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean operative time in our study came in agreement with those in others of same interest. The mean operative time ranges between 60-110 minutes with maximum values of 250-280 in those studies [1,3,4,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean operative time in our study came in agreement with those in others of same interest. The mean operative time ranges between 60-110 minutes with maximum values of 250-280 in those studies [1,3,4,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It may also be useful for explaining the various risks of laparoscopic and open procedures [1]. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy has generally a low incidence of morbidity and mortality and of conversion rate to open surgery, its outcome is particularly affected by the presence and severity of inflammation, advancing patient's age, male sex and greater body mass index [3]. Previous upper abdominal surgery is associated with a higher rate of adhesions, an increased risk of operative complications, a greater conversion rate, a prolonged operating time and longer stay [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An increasing ASA score has been shown in multiple studies to be an independent risk factor for CTO [25,27,28,52,62,66]. Patients with ASA score of 3 have 2.5 times odds of CTO (OR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3-4.6) than those with ASA score of 1 (P = 0.004) [66].…”
Section: Risk Factors and Predictivementioning
confidence: 96%
“…El diagnóstico de colelitiasis mediante imagen ecográfica es bastante efectivo (18), mientras que el diagnóstico de colecistitis aguda tiene criterios ecográficos establecidos, como: grosor de la pared vesicular igual o mayor de 4 mm, presencia de edema de la pared vesicular, litiasis intravesicular proyectada en el cuello, tamaño superior a 100 x 60 mm, líquido perivesicular, colédoco dilatado y bilis de estasis, lo que demuestra que es muy dependiente del operador (13,18,19). Sin embargo, cabe resaltar que en la investigación realizada no se encontró relación de la imagen ecográfica con la conversión de CL por falta de datos en los reportes imagenológicos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified