2014
DOI: 10.1089/acm.2014.5288.abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk in Homeopathy: Classification of Adverse Effects and Homeopathic Aggravations - A Cross Sectional Study Among Norwegian Homeopath Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For homeopathy, worsening was reported by 2.8 % of users, which is much lower than in another Norwegian Biopathy is a treatment system that encompasses several different alternative diagnostic tools and therapies such as homeopathy, herbs, reflexology c Naprapathy is a system of specific examination, diagnostics, manual treatment and rehabilitation of pain and dysfunction in the neuro-musculoskeletal system [43]. The deterioration rate following CAM therapy for amalgamattributed health complaints in this study (12.3 %) was similar to deterioration rates in three studies of amalgam removal for the same indication, also in highly selected patient groups (9.5 % of members of a Swedish dental patient association [7]; 14.7 % and 13 % of patients referred to dental material adverse reaction units in Sweden [29] and Norway [30], respectively) [7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For homeopathy, worsening was reported by 2.8 % of users, which is much lower than in another Norwegian Biopathy is a treatment system that encompasses several different alternative diagnostic tools and therapies such as homeopathy, herbs, reflexology c Naprapathy is a system of specific examination, diagnostics, manual treatment and rehabilitation of pain and dysfunction in the neuro-musculoskeletal system [43]. The deterioration rate following CAM therapy for amalgamattributed health complaints in this study (12.3 %) was similar to deterioration rates in three studies of amalgam removal for the same indication, also in highly selected patient groups (9.5 % of members of a Swedish dental patient association [7]; 14.7 % and 13 % of patients referred to dental material adverse reaction units in Sweden [29] and Norway [30], respectively) [7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…No unanticipated event in the form of aggravation or worsening of symptoms was reported by the patient throughout treatment. 21 22…”
Section: Patient Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adverse or unanticipated events: No unanticipated event in the form of aggravation or worsening of symptoms was reported by the patient throughout treatment, which can be categorised as an ‘adverse event’. 31 32…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homoeopathic aggravation: There was no increase in inintensity of existing symptoms throughout treatment in the form of ‘homoeopathic aggravations’ classified as per the existing standard and validated criteria. 31 32…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%