Risk information source preferences in construction workers

Abstract

Purpose – Many researchers have investigated the determinants of workers’ risk-taking/unsafe behaviours as a way to improve safety management and reduce accidents but there has been a general lack of research about workers’ risk information seeking behaviours or their source preferences for risk information. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether occupational risk information source preference was risk independent (i.e. whether workers prefer to receive occupational risk information from proximal sources like supervisors and workmates regardless of the nature of the risk or the source's expertise regarding that risk, or if they discriminated between information sources based on the type of risk being considered). Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 106 frontline construction workers who were recruited from a single building site within the UK with the help of the safety officer on site. The source from which workers preferred to receive information about a range of risks was measured using a ranking exercise. Specifically, workers were asked to rank five occupational sources (HSE, safety manager, project manager, supervisor, workmates) according to how much they preferred each one to deliver information about eight different risks (asbestos, back pain, site transport, heights, slips/trips, housekeeping, and site-specific and job-specific risks). Findings – The paper found that supervisors and safety managers were the most preferred sources of risk information overall, but a correspondence analysis suggested that workers’ risk information source preference is risk dependent and might be driven by source expertise. Practical implications – The findings have important practical implications for the role of safety managers in risk communication and for building trust within high-hazard organisations. Originality/value – To the author's knowledge, this is the first study to investigate risk information source preferences in an occupational setting.

Proactive Personality and Construction Worker Safety Behavior: Safety Self-Efficacy and Team Member Exchange as Mediators and Safety-Specific Transformational Leadership as Moderators

“…Third, considering the external conditions that promote proactive workers to exhibit more safe behaviors, trait activation theory suggests, in particular, that the effects of traits are more likely to be elicited by appropriate external situational stimuli under adverse circumstances [ 16 ]. However, as Grant [ 26 ] pointed out, motivated workers do not always exhibit behavior that is beneficial to the organization, and recent research has demonstrated a moderating effect of situational factors such as leadership style on the relationship between personality traits and behavior [ 5 , 74 ]. As anticipated, this study also found a moderating effect: that of safety-specific transformational leadership in the context of safety in proactive personality and safety behaviors.…”

How Do Psychological Cognition and Institutional Environment Affect the Unsafe Behavior of Construction Workers?—Research on fsQCA Method

“…In order to explore the main reasons of construction workers' unsafe behavior, scholars have carried out a large number of studies (Meng et al, 2021). The main psychological cognitive factor is safety attitude (Burns and Conchie, 2014;Shin et al, 2014;Man et al, 2019), safety motivation (Panuwatwanich et al, 2017;Xu et al, 2018), working pressure (Chang et al, 2005;Duma et al, 2014) and major institutional environmental factors including safety climate (Zhou et al, 2011;Liao et al, 2014;Guo et al, 2016b;Fargnoli and Lombardi, 2019), institutional regulation (Choudhry, 2014;Li et al, 2015) and education and training (Langford et al, 2000). These scholars hold different views on the key factors that influence the construction workers' unsafe behavior.…”

A Simulation Study on the Processes of Intra-Group Informal Interaction Affecting Workers’ Safety Behaviors

“…Previous research has identified that a worker’s formal interactions with his leader can influence his safety behaviors. For instance, He et al [ 59 ] reported that high-quality leader–member exchange within a group can enhance WSB; Burns et al [ 60 ] highlighted that safety transformational leadership can directly influence WSB and indirectly influence WSB through intrinsic motivation. Additionally, a worker’s colleagues also can affect his (her) safety behaviors.…”