Risk Management in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic in an Enterprise – Ishikawa Cause-and-Effect Diagram

Saja, Piotr; Woźny, Artur; Bednárová, Lucia

doi:10.2478/czoto-2021-0026

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From a long-term perspective, the need to develop tools that can be used to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of decision-making processes in various sectors when using resources drawing on EU funds has been highlighted, leading to the development of benchmarking indicators (65, 66). Their absence in the healthcare system to date is the result of not only the methodological complexity and strong heterogeneity of the healthcare systems, but also a lack of effort on the part of research teams to search for optimal decision-making mechanisms and indicators for their evaluation (67). Thus, the development of benchmarking indicators to enable the evaluation of the effects of implemented projects is an additional topic of research.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Public health and health research data: Availability, needs and challenges

2024

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frontiers is more than just an open access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals. Frontiers journal seriesThe Frontiers journal series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of openaccess, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers journal series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to qualityEach Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world's best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public -and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation. What are Frontiers Research Topics?Frontiers Research Topics are very popular trademarks of the Frontiers journals series: they are collections of at least ten articles, all centered on a particular subject. With their unique mix of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Frontiers Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Public health and health research data: Availability, needs and challenges

2024

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From a long-term perspective, the need to develop tools that can be used to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of decision-making processes in various sectors when using resources drawing on EU funds has been highlighted, leading to the development of benchmarking indicators ( 65 , 66 ). Their absence in the healthcare system to date is the result of not only the methodological complexity and strong heterogeneity of the healthcare systems, but also a lack of effort on the part of research teams to search for optimal decision-making mechanisms and indicators for their evaluation ( 67 ). Thus, the development of benchmarking indicators to enable the evaluation of the effects of implemented projects is an additional topic of research.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A fuzzy decision support model for the evaluation and selection of healthcare projects in the framework of competition

Gavurová

Келемен

Polishchuk

et al. 2023

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our research aims to support decision-making regarding the financing of healthcare projects by structural funds with policies targeting reduction of the development gap among different regions and countries of the European Union as well as the achievement of economic and social cohesion. A fuzzy decision support model for the evaluation and selection of healthcare projects should rank the project applications for the selected region, accounting for the investor's wishes in the form of a regional coefficient in order to reduce the development gap between regions. On the one hand, our proposed model evaluates project applications based on selected criteria, which may be structured, weakly structured, or unstructured. On the other hand, it also incorporates information on the level of healthcare development in the region. The obtained ranking increases the degree of validity of the decision regarding the selection of projects for financing by investors, considering the level of development of the region where the project will be implemented. At the expense of European Union (EU) structural funds, a village, city, region, or state can receive funds for modernization and development of the healthcare sector and all related processes. To minimize risks, it is necessary to implement adequate support systems for decision-making in the assessment of project applications, as well as regional policy in the region where the project will be implemented. The primary goal of this study was to develop a complex fuzzy decision support model for the evaluation and selection of projects in the field of healthcare with the aim of reducing the development gap between regions. Based on the above description, we formed the following scientific hypothesis for this research: if the project selected for financing can successfully achieve its stated goals and increase the level of development of its region, it should be evaluated positively. This evaluation can be obtained using a complex fuzzy model constructed to account for the region's level of development in terms of the availability and quality of healthcare services in the region where the project will be implemented.

show abstract

“…The PRA employed here relies on field observations and group meetings with communities and stakeholders, such as fisherman, farmers, small business owners, and tourism-related employees. More specifically, PRA verifies the results through a transect walk (Dooley et al, 2018;Schäffler et al, 2021), timeline (historical mapping) analysis (Mueller et al, 2010;Tomlinson et al, 2018), cause and effect diagram (Holme and Chalauisaeng, 2006;Saja et al, 2021), key informant interview (KII; Chenais et al, 2015;Balgah, 2016;Nicholson and Valentine, 2019;Dureab et al, 2021;Roothaert et al, 2021), and focus group discussion (FGD; Shamsuddin et al, 2007;Ng et al, 2021). These tools emphasize the following questions: What is the perception about shoreline change along the coast of Kuakata?…”

Section: Societal Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technical and Social Approaches to Study Shoreline Change of Kuakata, Bangladesh

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, shoreline determination has become an issue of increasing importance and concern, especially at the local level, as sea level continues to rise. This study identifies the rates of absolute and net erosion, accretion, and shoreline stabilization along the coast of Kuakata, a vulnerable coastal region in south-central Bangladesh. Shoreline change was detected by applying remote sensing and geographic information system (RS-GIS)-based techniques by using Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM), Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) satellite images at 30-m resolution from 1989, 2003, 2010, and 2020. The band combination (BC) method was used to extract the shoreline (i.e., land-water boundary) due to its improved accuracy over other methods for matching with the existing shoreline position. This study also used participatory rural appraisal (PRA) tools which revealed the societal impacts caused by the shoreline changes. Coupling RS-GIS and PRA techniques provides an enhanced understanding of shoreline change and its impacts because PRA enriches the RS-GIS outcomes by contextualizing the findings. Results show that from 1989 to 2020, a total of 13.59 km2 of coastal land was eroded, and 3.27 km2 of land was accreted, suggesting that land is retreating at about 0.32 km2 yr–1. Results from the PRA tools support this finding and demonstrate that fisheries and tourism are affected by the shoreline change. These results are important in Kuakata, a major tourist spot in Bangladesh, because of the impacts on fisheries, recreation, resource extraction, land use planning, and coastal risk management.

show abstract

Risk Management in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic in an Enterprise – Ishikawa Cause-and-Effect Diagram

Cited by 3 publications

References 7 publications

Public health and health research data: Availability, needs and challenges

Public health and health research data: Availability, needs and challenges

A fuzzy decision support model for the evaluation and selection of healthcare projects in the framework of competition

Technical and Social Approaches to Study Shoreline Change of Kuakata, Bangladesh

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About