2016
DOI: 10.2147/ott.s94151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk model in stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer with positive node after radical hysterectomy

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors in patients with surgically treated node-positive IB1-IIB cervical cancer and to establish a risk model for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 170 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy as primary treatment for node-positive International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer from January 2002 to December 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. Five… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although lymph node metastases negatively affect prognosis in cervical cancer, the survival of patients with lymph nodes metastasis is also strongly influenced by parametrial involvement. 8,23,24 Along similar lines, our results showed parametrial involvement was an independent predictor both for recurrence-free survival and overall survival among patients with stages IIIC1p. Accordingly, we rank parametrial involvement as a risk factor for further stratification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Although lymph node metastases negatively affect prognosis in cervical cancer, the survival of patients with lymph nodes metastasis is also strongly influenced by parametrial involvement. 8,23,24 Along similar lines, our results showed parametrial involvement was an independent predictor both for recurrence-free survival and overall survival among patients with stages IIIC1p. Accordingly, we rank parametrial involvement as a risk factor for further stratification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Clinical and postsurgical tumor stage as well as lymph node status are the most powerful predictors of outcome in cervical cancer 2 , 3 , 4 . The data regarding the prognostic impact of the tumor grade in squamous cell cancers (SCC) of the uterine cervix are controversial, and several approaches using different morphologic variables have been applied 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reports in the literature on survival and disease-free intervals and on their relationship to surgical-pathological factors in cervical carcinoma of the uterus 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 . Among these factors, pelvic lymph node involvement and tumor stage are well-established prognostic parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In microinvasive cervical cancer lymphogenic spread with invasion of strome to 3 mm in depth almost does not exist (less than 1%), and with stromal invasion from 3 to 5 mm this spread is rare (5–7%). In the stage Ib (FIGO), 15–20% of patients have pelvic (regional) metastases, then in stage IIb about 35%, and in stage III about 60% (Sankaranarayanan, 2006; Zhilan et al, 2016). Paraaortic nodes were attacked in less than 2% of cases in the IIb–III stage of the disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%