Health impacts of low-dose ionizing radiation are significant in important fields such as
X-ray imaging, radiation therapy, nuclear power, and others. However, all existing and
potential applications are currently challenged by public concerns and regulatory
restrictions. We aimed to assess the validity of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model of
radiation damage, which is the basis of current regulation, and to assess the
justification for this regulation. We have conducted an extensive search in PubMed.
Special attention has been given to papers cited in comprehensive reviews of the United
States (2006) and French (2005) Academies of Sciences and in the United Nations Scientific
Committee on Atomic Radiation 2016 report. Epidemiological data provide essentially no
evidence for detrimental health effects below 100 mSv, and several studies suggest
beneficial (hormetic) effects. Equally significant, many studies with in vitro and in
animal models demonstrate that several mechanisms initiated by low-dose radiation have
beneficial effects. Overall, although probably not yet proven to be untrue, LNT has
certainly not been proven to be true. At this point, taking into account the high price
tag (in both economic and human terms) borne by the LNT-inspired regulation, there is
little doubt that the present regulatory burden should be reduced.