2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00302-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of malignancy in patients with celiac disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
234
2
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
234
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, assessment of the level of non-adherence at which possible interventions would be deemed to be most beneficial is also problematic, as the potential individual and societal health benefit of small changes in gluten consumption is difficult to estimate. The risk of malignancy, for example, is now believed to be much lower than previously estimated and the influence of occasional non-adherence is unclear (Akobeng & Thomas, 2008;Catassi et al, 2007;Green et al, 2003;Haines, Anderson, & Gibson, 2008;Kaukinen et al, 1999;Silano et al, 2007). Diagnostic delay may have an influence on the likelihood of long term complications beyond treatment adherence (Silano et al, 2007) although the evidence for this is mixed (Haines et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, assessment of the level of non-adherence at which possible interventions would be deemed to be most beneficial is also problematic, as the potential individual and societal health benefit of small changes in gluten consumption is difficult to estimate. The risk of malignancy, for example, is now believed to be much lower than previously estimated and the influence of occasional non-adherence is unclear (Akobeng & Thomas, 2008;Catassi et al, 2007;Green et al, 2003;Haines, Anderson, & Gibson, 2008;Kaukinen et al, 1999;Silano et al, 2007). Diagnostic delay may have an influence on the likelihood of long term complications beyond treatment adherence (Silano et al, 2007) although the evidence for this is mixed (Haines et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma is an aggressive disorder frequently associated with celiac disease [38,39]. Patients with celiac disease have an increased risk of various malignancies [38], including adenocarcinoma of the small bowel and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.…”
Section: Enteropathy-associated T-cell Lymphomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all patients diagnosed with enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma have known celiac disease [39]. In a large international study of T-cell lymphomas, only one-third of the patients with enteropathyassociated T-cell lymphoma had previously been diagnosed with celiac disease [39].…”
Section: Enteropathy-associated T-cell Lymphomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adenocarcinoma of the small intestine is a rare carcinoma and the risk for this carcinoma is increased in subjects with celiac disease. However, the absolute risk for this cancer is still quite low given its rarity (52). Patients may complain of abdominal pain and/or be found to have occult bleeding and further evaluation for this carcinoma should be considered in patients with celiac disease who develop these signs or symptoms after the resolution of the acute phase of their disease (5).…”
Section: Complications Of Celiac Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients may complain of abdominal pain and/or be found to have occult bleeding and further evaluation for this carcinoma should be considered in patients with celiac disease who develop these signs or symptoms after the resolution of the acute phase of their disease (5). Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has also been reported to be increased in patients with celiac disease, although the absolute risk of disease is low (52), and at this time would not in itself justify the need for routine screening for celiac disease in the general population.…”
Section: Complications Of Celiac Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%