2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Stratification by Treadmill Exercise Echocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peteiro et al reported lower peak double product in patients with cardiac events during the follow-up period after undergoing ESE. 33 Van der Sijde et al found increased RPP max as a univariate but not multivariate predictor of long-term cardiac death in a sample of patients with both positive and negative DSE. 34 However, in the study of Mccully et al RPP max was not associated with the adverse outcome in patients with normal ESE 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Peteiro et al reported lower peak double product in patients with cardiac events during the follow-up period after undergoing ESE. 33 Van der Sijde et al found increased RPP max as a univariate but not multivariate predictor of long-term cardiac death in a sample of patients with both positive and negative DSE. 34 However, in the study of Mccully et al RPP max was not associated with the adverse outcome in patients with normal ESE 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…ESE also allows a better stratification of patients with low-risk Duke treadmill score, aiding in the decision whether to perform coronary angiography [26] . Several studies have shown that gender, functional capacity, rate-pressure product, resting LV function, and ischemia are independently associated with cardiac events [26,27] , and that ESE has incremental predictive value in patients with different pre-test probabilities of CAD [27] . Patients with WMA involving the territories of the 3 coronary arteries, patients with peak wall motion score index > 1.5, and patients with ischemia at a distance are at higher risk for cardiac events [28] .…”
Section: Prognostic Value Of Exercise Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are further advantages of ESE over these other techniques, including: safety (approximately 1 event/7000 in ESE, 1/700 in pharmacological stress echocardiography) [60,61] ; relatively high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 80% and specificity 86%) [54] , comparable to that of nuclear imaging but higher than that of exercise ECG [53] ; solid prognostic data (less that 1% events/year in patients with a negative stress echocardiogram) [22,25,27,62] ; and the fact that it is a green technology (compared to nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary computed tomographic angiography that may expose the patient to radiation levels equivalent to as many as 600 plain chest X-rays) [63] . In addition, the cost of stress echocardiography is lower than that of other noninvasive imaging techniques.…”
Section: The Competitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%