Riskier tests for p factor hypotheses: A reply to Watts et al. (2023)
Orestis Zavlis,
Peter Fonagy,
Richard Bentall
et al.
Abstract:Watts and colleagues (2023) provide a comprehensive and critical evaluation of the p factor field, which concludes by suggesting ‘p-factor … theories … should stand up to risky tests’. In this commentary, we extend this conclusion by arguing that the riskiest tests come from computational, not statistical, models. We illustrate our point by drawing from a recent computational model of ours, which appears promising in explaining, not simply describing, the positive manifold of emotional psychopathology.
Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.