2024
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/tqjgh
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Riskier tests for p factor hypotheses: A reply to Watts et al. (2023)

Orestis Zavlis,
Peter Fonagy,
Richard Bentall
et al.

Abstract: Watts and colleagues (2023) provide a comprehensive and critical evaluation of the p factor field, which concludes by suggesting ‘p-factor … theories … should stand up to risky tests’. In this commentary, we extend this conclusion by arguing that the riskiest tests come from computational, not statistical, models. We illustrate our point by drawing from a recent computational model of ours, which appears promising in explaining, not simply describing, the positive manifold of emotional psychopathology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 8 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?