2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-949-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RNA Visualization in Bacteria by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

Abstract: Detecting localized RNA in bacteria is difficult due to the properties of RNA and the small size of the cell. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been an invaluable method for detecting and imaging RNA. In FISH, RNA is fixed in its native subcellular position through chemical cross-linking. An oligonucleotide probe conjugated to a fluorophore is annealed to the target RNA, and the target RNA/probe hybrid is visualized using fluorescence microscopy. This chapter describes the use of FISH to visualize … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We would instead recommend the use of more nuanced filtering approaches that have been developed to help in situations where cross-contamination is high or when taxa closely related to common DNA contaminants are thought to be present in biological samples [70][71][72][73]. Finally, should contaminant taxa still be driving biological signal after filtering, they should be verified using a different approach such as an effectively used and validated Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) assay [74,75] (3) Bioinformatic modeling has been developed to estimate the source and proportions of contaminant taxa within biological samples. For example, SourceTracker analysis uses Bayesian modeling to estimate the proportion of potential contaminant taxa from a data set [76].…”
Section: ) Critically Assess and Report Contributions Of Contaminatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would instead recommend the use of more nuanced filtering approaches that have been developed to help in situations where cross-contamination is high or when taxa closely related to common DNA contaminants are thought to be present in biological samples [70][71][72][73]. Finally, should contaminant taxa still be driving biological signal after filtering, they should be verified using a different approach such as an effectively used and validated Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) assay [74,75] (3) Bioinformatic modeling has been developed to estimate the source and proportions of contaminant taxa within biological samples. For example, SourceTracker analysis uses Bayesian modeling to estimate the proportion of potential contaminant taxa from a data set [76].…”
Section: ) Critically Assess and Report Contributions Of Contaminatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples with very low read counts should be excluded from further analysis. It should also be noted that additional methods are available should subtractive filtering fail to successfully remove suspected contaminant taxa 51 …”
Section: Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%