Roadmap to FAIR Research Information in Open Infrastructures

Hauschke, Christian; Nazarovets, Serhii; Алтемеіер, Франзіска; Калюжна, Наталія

doi:10.1080/19386389.2021.1999156

Cited by 13 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…DOIs are of critical importance in building reliable links between scientific documents and help make scientific data accessible, interoperable, findable, and reusable in accordance with FAIR principles (Wilkinson et al, 2016;Hauschke et al, 2021). Additionally, for users' convenience, DOI content can be used at any level of publication detail, DOI-related metadata can specify different document formats (DeRisi et al, 2003), or link a paper's translation to its original version (Birukou and Skalaban, 2020).…”

Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of The Doi And Competing Data Stora...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Publication History: A Double-DOI-Based Method for Storing and/or Monitoring Information about Published and Corrected Academic Literature

Silva¹,

Nazarovets

2022

Journal of Scholarly Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The status of published literature can change at any time in its history following publication, although existing structures in academic publishing for recording these changes, despite the existence of a number of robust tools—such as the digital object identifier (DOI)—appear to be insufficiently robust, or used too inconsistently or inefficiently, to deal with multiple corrections. In this article, an information storage method and corrective measure or tool is proposed—the ‘publication history’—that considers the full history and background of an article’s publication. The ‘publication history’ is adjusted to record changes to an article over time, and is thus a ‘live’ document, always open to modification and updating. The ‘publication history’ has the potential to accommodate, in a single document (in both PDF and HTML format), information about pre-publication (e.g., preprints) and post-publication events, including submission, resubmission, acceptance date, handling editors, peer-review format, corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions. The ‘publication history’ employs two DOIs, one for the article and one for any and all edits, to document these changes. Our proposal offers one possible solution for fortifying the integrity of peer review and the publication process pre- and post–peer review. The double-DOI-based ‘publication history’ can be applied to any document.

show abstract

Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of The Doi And Competing Data Stora...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Publication History: A Double-DOI-Based Method for Storing and/or Monitoring Information about Published and Corrected Academic Literature

Silva¹,

Nazarovets

2022

Journal of Scholarly Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the study (Hajduk et al, 2019), scientists emphasize that data exchange should be simple, feasible and accessible. Therefore, ensuring quality, reproducibility and interoperability is possible by applying FAIR principles to the open dissemination of scientific knowledge (Hauschke et al, 2021;De Smedt et al, 2020). Applying FAIR principles is a component of the research data management (Wilkinson et al, 2016).…”

Section: Open Research Data In the Open Science Ecosystem And Busines...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Open Research Data in the Open Science Ecosystem and Business Environment

Boyko

Kramarenko

Mayboroda

2022

BEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today, one can observe shifts in the research landscape, which is formed by digitization and open science principles. The open science movement continues to gain momentum, attention and debate. In parallel with the principle of unity, open science gives rise to a taxonomy of several related ideas, guidelines and concepts, such as open access, open replicable research and open data. Over the past fifteen years, research institutions have focused on open access to publications. However, recently the focus of attention has shifted to research data as a “new currency” in research activities and their distribution in open access, and the guiding principles of data management are becoming crucial for the wide implementation of open science practices and the effective use of data in research, industry, business and other sectors of the economy. In this context, it is relevant to carry out a thorough study of primary scientific works on open science issues and to study the role of the concept of “open research data” in the paradigm of a holistic ecosystem of open science and business ecosystem. In this work, it is proposed to use the methods of quantitative and qualitative bibliometric analysis, which allows to identify the main trends and form the basis for further research. The information base for this work was the international scientometric database Scopus, which enables to analyze bibliographic data using built-in tools and import them for external use in the VOSviewer software. The study revealed an increasing trend in the number of publications on the subject under study, with the highest annual growth rate in 2017 (76%) and 2019 (66%). Qualitative bibliographic analysis made it possible to analyze the most cited and, therefore, trending works on the selected topic. In terms of the number of citations per year, the results show that the studies with such directions in open science as open program code (open source); data/research reproducibility, research data management; open access to publications (open access) are most popular. In addition, a cluster analysis of the co-prevalence of keywords was conducted. It formed clusters dedicated to both institutional and infrastructural problems of the development of open science and research data. Separately, the results of the analysis create a scientific basis for further research into the key determinants of the effectiveness of the implementation of a proper research data management system at the micro, meso, and macro levels. It will improve the effectiveness of the implementation of scientific developments from one field of knowledge to another, while achieving increased interdisciplinary research. In parallel with this, interested persons of the real sector of the economy get the opportunity to analyze scientific results, determining the possibility of their adoption in their own activities.

show abstract

“…If the word is rarely used, the number of points is multiplied by 2 of Ukrainian literature available today do not come from original works of writers, but from Soviet publications, which could have been subjected to significant editorial interference and ideological distortion by Soviet censorship [20]. Some important steps in digitizing and presenting the Borys Grinchenko works have already been made by the Grinchenko University Library in previous years, but the results of these projects do not comply with FAIR principles [10]. These digitized documents and their metadata are available online to anyone under open licenses.…”

Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Case Study: Citizen Science in Digital Humanities context

Opryshko

Nazarovets

2021

Digital Humanities Workshop

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern academic librarians strive to qualitatively meet the information needs of their users. At the same time, librarians seek to take an active part in the organization and conduct of research. In this paper, we present the successful experience of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University (Ukraine) in working on the wiki project "Dictionary of Borys Grinchenko" which uses elements of digital humanities, citizen science and gamification. The main aim of this project is to involve university students in getting acquainted with the Dictionary of the famous Ukrainian ethnographer and ethnographer Borys Grinchenko . During the project, students compete among themselves who will add the most quality explanations and visualizations of the Grinchenko's Dictionary words to the University wiki portal. The results show that this project not only promotes the development of university web resources but also promotes cultural heritage, develop successful team building, helps to the involvement of students in research activities. This experience will be useful for other academic libraries looking for ways to join the digital humanities and can be replicated in small, low-budget academic institutions. CCS CONCEPTS• Human-centered computing → Wikis.

show abstract

Roadmap to FAIR Research Information in Open Infrastructures

Cited by 13 publications

References 19 publications

Publication History: A Double-DOI-Based Method for Storing and/or Monitoring Information about Published and Corrected Academic Literature

Publication History: A Double-DOI-Based Method for Storing and/or Monitoring Information about Published and Corrected Academic Literature

Open Research Data in the Open Science Ecosystem and Business Environment

Case Study: Citizen Science in Digital Humanities context

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About