Mobile Robotics 2009
DOI: 10.1142/9789814291279_0047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic Device for Cleaning Photovoltaic Panel Arrays

Abstract: , +30-210-60.90.880 With growing costs of electricity and concern for the environmental impact of fossil fuels, implementation of eco-friendly energy sources like solar power are rising. The main method for harnessing solar power is with arrays made up of photovoltaic (PV) panels. Accumulation of dust and debris on even one panel in an array reduces their efficiency in energy generation considerably and emphasizes the need to keep the panels' surface as clean as possible. Current labor-based cleaning methods f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The desert regions also face erratic temperature fluctuations, which further serve as a hindrance to the moving parts and cause the batteries to become defective. Thus this additional maintenance and energy consumption posed by robotic cleaning proves to be a point of debate for commercial applications [18].Anti-soiling (AS) coatings have shown to be effective in protecting the surface from dust deposition but diminish the overall transparency of the collector top surface. The commercially available AS coatings are predominantly hydrophobic due to their inherent property of interdicting water to wet the surface causing the dust particles to adhere to the suspended water droplet which rolls off the surface, thereby acting as a cleaning mechanism.…”
Section: Soiling and Power Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The desert regions also face erratic temperature fluctuations, which further serve as a hindrance to the moving parts and cause the batteries to become defective. Thus this additional maintenance and energy consumption posed by robotic cleaning proves to be a point of debate for commercial applications [18].Anti-soiling (AS) coatings have shown to be effective in protecting the surface from dust deposition but diminish the overall transparency of the collector top surface. The commercially available AS coatings are predominantly hydrophobic due to their inherent property of interdicting water to wet the surface causing the dust particles to adhere to the suspended water droplet which rolls off the surface, thereby acting as a cleaning mechanism.…”
Section: Soiling and Power Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…79cleaning}9 Scarcity of water resources, large amounts of water usage, deionization process expenses, and the labor cost to perform the cleaning procedure are the main prohibitive factors associated with the cleaning method using water. As an alternative method, robotic devices are under developmental stages to be utilized in large-scale solar plants to restore their efficiency [8,9,10]. Although significant endeavors , Heliotex} have been pursuit in improving the performance of robotic devices, they are still facing some challenges such as scalibility, minimization of water usage, maintenance and operation costs, to name a few.…”
Section: Developing}7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existing robot is still very costly [7] of about $50,000 and should be operated by at least two human operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%