Robotic vs laparoscopic right colectomy – the burden of age and comorbidity in perioperative outcomes: An observational study

Abstract

BACKGROUND Several studies have shown the safety, feasibility and oncologic adequacy of robotic right hemicolectomy (RRH). Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) is considered technically challenging. Robotic surgery has been introduced to overcome this technical limitation, but it is related to high costs. To maximize the benefits of such surgery, only selected patients are candidates for this technique. In addition, due to progressive aging of the population, an increasing number of minimally invasive procedures are performed on elderly patients with severe comorbidities, who are usually more prone to post-operative complications. AIM To investigate the outcomes of RRH vs LRH with regard to age and comorbidities. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 123 minimally invasive procedures (68 LRHs vs 55 RRHs) for right colon cancer or endoscopically unresectable adenoma performed in our Center from January 2014 until September 2019. The surgical procedures were performed according to standardized techniques. The primary clinical outcome of the study was the length of hospital stay (LOS) measured in days. Secondary outcomes were time to first flatus (TFF) and time to first stool evacuation. The robotic technique was considered the exposure and the laparoscopic technique was considered the control. Routine demographic variables were obtained, including age at time of surgery and gender. Body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status were registered. The age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) was calculated; the tumor-node-metastasis system, intra-operative variables and post-operative complications were recorded. Post-operative follow-up was 180 d. RESULTS LOS, TFF, and time to first stool were significantly shorter in the robotic group: Median 6 [interquartile range (IQR) 5-8] vs 7 (IQR 6-10.5) d, P = 0.028; median 2 (IQR 1-3) vs 3 (IQR 2-4) d, P < 0.001; median 4 (IQR 3-5) vs 5 (IQR 4-6.5) d, P = 0.005, respectively. Following multivariable analysis, the robotic technique was confirmed to be predictive of significantly shorter hospitalization and faster restoration of bowel function; in addition the dichotomous variables of age over 75 years and ACCI more than 7 were significant predictors of hospital stay. No outcomes were significantly associated with Clavien-Dindo grading. Sub-group analysis demonstrated that patients aged over 75 years had a longer LOS (median 6 -IQR 5-8- vs 7 -IQR 6-12- d, P = 0.013) and later TFF (median 2 -IQR 1-3- vs 3 -IQR 2-4- d, P = 0.008), while patients with ACCI more than 7 were only associated with a prolonged hospital stay (median...

Comparison of clinical efficacy of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy for right colon tumor

“…After detailed treatment of the remaining studies, 5 other studies were excluded. Finally, 10 studies were included in our meta-analysis [1,2,5,8–14] Table 1. summarized the baseline characteristics and assessments for 10 studies.…”

“…Finally, 10 studies were included in our metaanalysis. [1,2,5,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Table 1 summarized the baseline characteristics and assessments for 10 studies.…”

Single‐port laparoscopic versus single‐port robotic right hemicolectomy: Postoperative short‐term outcomes

“…However, SPR uses three robotic multi‐joint endowrist instruments, which can perform the role of an assistant efficiently. Previous papers comparing robotic and laparoscopic multi‐port right colectomy reported a faster bowel movement return in robotic surgery 23,24 . In a multivariable analysis conducted by Tagliabue et al., using the robotic technique was predictive of the faster restoration of bowel function 23 .…”

“…In both surgical methods, the median number of lymph nodes was more than 20, and there were no cases of lymph node resection with fewer than 12. In some studies, 24,25 more lymph nodes were collected from robotic surgery, but other studies 23,26,27 did not show differences between the two groups. The present study also did not show a significant difference.…”

“…Previous papers comparing robotic and laparoscopic multi-port right colectomy reported a faster bowel movement return in robotic surgery. 23,24 In a multivariable analysis conducted by Tagliabue et al, using the robotic technique was predictive of the faster restoration of bowel function. 23 The rapid bowel movements in the SPR group identified in this study were probably because the operator could use one more articulated instrument when performing SPR, which resulted in efficient bowel traction and less bowel manipulation.…”