2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic Thymectomy Is Feasible for Large Thymomas: A Propensity-Matched Comparison

Abstract: RAT can be performed safely and effectively in a radical fashion for large thymomas. Future studies are necessary to determine long-term oncologic outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
52
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in previous publications, resection of large thymic tumors by robotic surgery is safe and effective. (12,23) In our study, large tumors (largest diameter: 12.5 cm) were resected, which corroborates the hypothesis that size should not be considered an absolute contraindication to the method. Currently, the major limitation in cases of mediastinal lesions is the invasion of vascular structures, because the use of robots has not been proven safe in those cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As shown in previous publications, resection of large thymic tumors by robotic surgery is safe and effective. (12,23) In our study, large tumors (largest diameter: 12.5 cm) were resected, which corroborates the hypothesis that size should not be considered an absolute contraindication to the method. Currently, the major limitation in cases of mediastinal lesions is the invasion of vascular structures, because the use of robots has not been proven safe in those cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Several of the studies had a high risk of selection bias due to historical controls (24,32,34,36,37), differences in criteria for patient selection (22,33), or patient characteristic differences between groups (23). Studies that performed propensity score matching for outcomes of interest were considered at low risk for selection bias (25,(27)(28)(29)(30)35), as were the papers by Qian et al (31) and Ye et al (39), due to contemporary controls, the same selection criteria, and no differences in patient characteristics. Most of the studies were rated as unknown or high risk for performance bias due to a lack of information provided on surgical techniques and care pathways.…”
Section: Quality Of Evidence: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper by Weksler et al (36) was assessed as having a high risk of detection bias because the authors specifically mentioned not being able to obtain accurate operative times for the transsternal group and did not report all of the same outcomes for each group. All of the other studies were rated as unclear risk due to a lack of information (22,24,26,28,35,39), or as low risk of detection bias due to prospectively collected data (27,33,34,37), data entry into a registry (23), precise definitions of outcomes provided (25,29,30,38), or because any missing definitions were unlikely to affect outcomes (31,32). The study by Weksler et al (36) was also assessed as high risk for attrition bias because of incomplete data that was likely due to intervention type.…”
Section: Quality Of Evidence: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, robotic thymectomy might be considered a safe and effective procedure for thymomas, also in large tumours with equivalent radicality when compared to open procedures yet with lower morbidity and shorter hospital stay (5)(6)(7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%