2015
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2014.2382106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and Accurate Shape Model Matching Using Random Forest Regression-Voting

Abstract: A widely used approach for locating points on deformable objects in images is to generate feature response images for each point, and then to fit a shape model to these response images. We demonstrate that Random Forest regression-voting can be used to generate high quality response images quickly. Rather than using a generative or a discriminative model to evaluate each pixel, a regressor is used to cast votes for the optimal position of each point. We show that this leads to fast and accurate shape model mat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
126
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that different pathology grades have very narrow intervals so even a slight shift in landmark location can change the pathology assessment result. As another random-forest based approach, the method approached by Lindner et al, 37 yields a slightly higher success detection range for high ranges and consequently a better performance in pathology assessment. It should be noted that they combined a random forest-based intensity model with a different shape model, hence it is hard to assess whether the performance difference is due to the intensity appearance model or the shape model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that different pathology grades have very narrow intervals so even a slight shift in landmark location can change the pathology assessment result. As another random-forest based approach, the method approached by Lindner et al, 37 yields a slightly higher success detection range for high ranges and consequently a better performance in pathology assessment. It should be noted that they combined a random forest-based intensity model with a different shape model, hence it is hard to assess whether the performance difference is due to the intensity appearance model or the shape model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L2,1 norm based kernel SVR is presented by Martinez et al [19] to substitute the commonly used least squares regressor, which improves the performance of face alignment across views. Gaussian process [20,21] and Random Forest voting [14,22,23] are also introduced into cascaded regression framework. Zhang et al [34] and Zhu et al [30] further study hierarchical or coarse-to-fine searching for face alignment.…”
Section: Multi-pose Face Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice and learning of shape-indexed features are also studied [15][16][17]. A series of regression methods have been employed into cascaded regression framework to deal with over-fitting and local minima problems in the wild condition, including ridge regression [18], Support Vector [19], Gaussian process [20,21], Random Forest voting [14,22,23], Deep Neural Nets [16,24,25], and project-out cascaded regression [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated the detection accuracy of the CNN model by comparing the linear support vector machine (SVM) [20], [21] and random forest [22]- [25]. First, we introduced the accuracy of linear SVM and random forest.…”
Section: Detection Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%