2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.02.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and complex approach of pathological speech signal analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
92
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of them are well known in the field of speech signal processing, and thus for each parameter a reference is provided where a deeper description and further information can be found. All features are calculated using a software tool developed in our research group using Praat (Boersma and Weenink, 2017) and MATLAB (MATLAB, 2017) (López-de-Ipiña et al, 2017;Mekyska et al, 2015).…”
Section: Protocols and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them are well known in the field of speech signal processing, and thus for each parameter a reference is provided where a deeper description and further information can be found. All features are calculated using a software tool developed in our research group using Praat (Boersma and Weenink, 2017) and MATLAB (MATLAB, 2017) (López-de-Ipiña et al, 2017;Mekyska et al, 2015).…”
Section: Protocols and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach focuses on testing whether there is a common mean of speech features from several groups. Besides the ANOVA F-test giving the ratio of variances between and within groups [16], the hypothesis probability resulting from the Wilcoxon test [25] or the Mann-Whitney U test [26] comparing whether two samples come from identical distributions with equal medians or they do not have equal medians, the Ansari-Bradley hypothesis test [27] is used to specify whether two distributions are the same or they differ in their variances. For a chosen significance level the resulting logical value "0" denotes that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected and the value "1" indicates that it can be rejected.…”
Section: B Anova-based Classification Of the Speech Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PD-induced neuromotor degeneration speech monitoring has been classicaly based on phonation (fundamental frequency, energy, jitter, shimmer, noise-harmonic ratio, biomechanical parameters (Gómez et al, 2017a;Mekyska et al, 2015;Orozco et al, 2015). Speech articulation is also a possible target to explore.…”
Section: Kinematic Evaluation Of Pdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it affects most neuromotor paths, it also interferes with speech capability in different ways, which have been extensively well documented (Mekyska et al, 2015). Rough and asthenic phonation, monotonicity, mono-loudness, freezing, velo-pharyngeal incompetence, and low tone are some of the observed alterations of speech coined with the term hypokinetic dysarthria (Sapir, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%