2001
DOI: 10.1080/00207170010006628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust l1estimation using the Popov-Tsypkin multiplier with application to robust fault detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof: The proof follows from the lemma in Ref. 18. Remark: Minimization of the upper bound is a more appropriate approach than some conventional methods.…”
Section: Robust 1 Estimationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof: The proof follows from the lemma in Ref. 18. Remark: Minimization of the upper bound is a more appropriate approach than some conventional methods.…”
Section: Robust 1 Estimationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Until recent work, 11,14,18,20 the relatively nonconservative mixed structured singular value (MSSV) techniques 21−24 had not been applied to robust estimation, although more conservative techniques, based on the small-gain theorem or fixed quadratic Lyapunov functions, had been used (see Refs. 15,16,[25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved, for instance, by using geometric considerations regarding the plant, as in [9], [14], and [15], or by optimizing a particular norm minimization objective, such as the H ∞ -or l 1 -norm (see [6], [8], and [16]- [18]) The latter approach provides, in general, important robustness properties, as stressed in [5], [7], [16], and [19], by explicitly accounting for model uncertainty. In [20], integral quadratic constraints for uncertain systems are used for model validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main idea in such architectures stems from the designing of filters that are more reactive to faults than to disturbances and model uncertainty. This can be achieved, for instance, by using geometric considerations regarding the plant (), or by optimizing a particular norm minimization objective, such as the scriptHMathClass-rel∞‐norm or ℓ 1 ‐norm (). The latter approach provides, in general, important robustness properties, as stressed in , by explicitly accounting for model uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%