1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf02595273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock and soil description and classification for engineering geological mapping report by the IAEG Commission on Engineering Geological Mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphology of the study area frequently shows the existence of hummocky terrain, revealing undulating topography on the basis of the predominant slope angles, which helped with the lithological interpretation, because this undulating topography corresponded frequently to layers with high and low resistance that may influence the slope stability and change hydrogeological conditions. Thus, from the sandstone and claystone complexes proposed by Zbyszewski and Almeida (1960), new sub-complexes were identified through the detailing and improvement of the lithological data, namely: (i) sandstone dominated complexes and (ii) shale dominated complexes (Matula, 1981). The sandstone dominated complexes correspond to intermediate strength to hard rock masses, and the shale dominated complexes correspond to weak rock masses.…”
Section: Improvement Of the Lithological Mapmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The morphology of the study area frequently shows the existence of hummocky terrain, revealing undulating topography on the basis of the predominant slope angles, which helped with the lithological interpretation, because this undulating topography corresponded frequently to layers with high and low resistance that may influence the slope stability and change hydrogeological conditions. Thus, from the sandstone and claystone complexes proposed by Zbyszewski and Almeida (1960), new sub-complexes were identified through the detailing and improvement of the lithological data, namely: (i) sandstone dominated complexes and (ii) shale dominated complexes (Matula, 1981). The sandstone dominated complexes correspond to intermediate strength to hard rock masses, and the shale dominated complexes correspond to weak rock masses.…”
Section: Improvement Of the Lithological Mapmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The urban environmental engineering and geological quality assessment have been adequately addressed by employing multivariate statistical analysis and GIS (Matula, 1981;Cross, 2002;Lee et al, 2004;Sarkar et al, 2007). Researchers have also studied the urban land suitability analysis by means of fuzzy classification methods and multi-criteria analysis (Hall, 1992;Davidson, 1994;Store and Kangas, 2001;Bagdanaviciute and Jurijus, 2013), as well as urban ecological suitability assessment for urban development and planning via ecology methods (Lathrop and Bognar, 1998;Svoray et al, 2005;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This made possible to stablish the criteria for identifying and mapping the geotechnical units. Primarily, the units were divided into categories ('zone') according to their lithological nature (rock, soil, mixed); the second level of differentiation ('subzone') is based on the prevailing uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of the unit; on a third level called 'unit', it is imperative that the geotechnical unit can be mapped; and finally, 'soil' and 'rock' units were further subdivided ('subunit') into granular/cohesive soils and hard/soft rocks (Dearman, 1991;IAEG, 1976;Matula, 1981;Varnes, 1974), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%