“…The final meta-analysis included 47 articles. There were 22 articles with 12,833 cases and 151,86 controls for rs1047768 T>C [ 7 – 9 , 12 , 14 – 31 ], 14 studies with 11,327 cases and 12,684 controls for rs2296147 T>C [ 9 – 11 , 13 , 18 , 24 , 26 – 28 , 32 – 37 ], 11 studies with 5,898 cases and 7,448 controls for rs2227869 G>C [ 8 , 9 , 14 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 22 , 25 , 38 – 40 ], 17 studies with 9,826 cases and 10,552 controls for rs2094258 C>T [ 10 , 11 , 18 , 24 , 26 – 28 , 34 – 37 , 41 – 46 ], 21 studies with 10,369 cases and 11,207 controls for rs751402 C>T [ 10 , 13 , 24 , 26 – 29 , 31 , 32 , 36 , 37 , 42 – 45 , 47 – 52 ], and 14 studies with 10,873 cases and 12,535 controls for rs873601 G>A [ 9 – 11 , 18 , 24 , 26 – 28 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 52 – 54 ]. A flow chart summarizing the process of relevant study identification is shown in Figure 1 , and the study characteristics are shown in Table 1 .…”