2014
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2014.01.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root Responses to Alterations in Macroporosity and Penetrability in a Silt Loam Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…S4), and root buckling was not observed. As observed for different small-grain cereals in previous studies (Barraclough and Weir, 1988;Materechera et al, 1992;Grzesiak et al, 2013;Hernandez-Ramirez et al, 2014;Colombi and Walter, 2016), root diameters of 2-d-old seedlings increased with increasing soil bulk density (Table I). However, the data obtained from our study strongly suggest that this acclimation of root morphology to increased soil strength was limited by a maximum root diameter.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S4), and root buckling was not observed. As observed for different small-grain cereals in previous studies (Barraclough and Weir, 1988;Materechera et al, 1992;Grzesiak et al, 2013;Hernandez-Ramirez et al, 2014;Colombi and Walter, 2016), root diameters of 2-d-old seedlings increased with increasing soil bulk density (Table I). However, the data obtained from our study strongly suggest that this acclimation of root morphology to increased soil strength was limited by a maximum root diameter.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…This adjustment of roots to increased soil strength reduces the risk of root buckling and decreases the mechanical stress acting on the root during penetration (Materechera et al, 1992;Kirby and Bengough, 2002;Chimungu et al, 2015). Root thickening in response to increased soil strength has been observed in a wide range of species under field and laboratory conditions and often coincides with increased cortical area (Atwell, 1990a;Materechera et al, 1992;Grzesiak et al, 2013;Siczek et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2014;Hernandez-Ramirez et al, 2014;Colombi and Walter, 2016). Since root thickening decreases penetration stress and stabilizes roots, thick roots are likely to be an advantage in soils with increased mechanical impedance (Materechera et al, 1992;Kirby and Bengough, 2002;Chimungu et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume of air-filled pores, the content of oxygen in soil air, and its exchange capacity have an enormous effect of the development of plant root systems and on the uptake of nutrients by plants. Macropores make it possible for plant roots to bypass soil zones with excessive mechanical resistance, especially in the deeper genetic horizons [12,14,45]. Soil air capacity considered the minimum is 0.100-m Mesopores with equivalent diameter of 20-0.2 µm retain water usable for plants in the range of soil water potential from -15.5 to -1554 kPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable aggregate structure prevents excessive compaction of soil and ensures that the soil has a favourable content of capillary pores (with equivalent diameter of 0.2-20 μm) for the retention of water usable for plants, and a suitable content of macropores with diameters >20 μm, which determine the hydraulic conductivity and air capacity and permeability [10][11][12]. Thanks to this, plant roots have unconstrained access both to water and to oxygen contained in soil air.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil compaction level can be quantified by the soil density, which increases the soil resistance to penetration (SUZUKI et al, 2007;HERNANDEZ-RAMIREZ et al, 2014;KUNCORO et al, 2014). Soil compaction levels between 2.0 and 2.5 MPa were reported as the critical limits of resistance to penetration for most vegetables (SILVEIRA et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%